Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Magic as a skill system
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyeshet" data-source="post: 3525917" data-attributes="member: 18363"><p>Elements of Magic is not BESM. It is a totally separate / different d20 sourcebook. </p><p></p><p>Source book<strong>s</strong>, actually, as there are two books on point based system and one on a skill based system. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I like both - far and above the slot system, but I think a synthesis of the two might work better. I'm working on a few ideas, but it will likely be a while before there is anything to playtest. The general idea is that magic would use Complex Skill Checks (sort of like what is defined in the UA; ie: multiple skill checks for a single success). Failures and (to a far lesser extent) Near Failures would drain the mana points, eventually bringing about fatigue, exhaustion, etc - rather like major draining of wound points (another house rule). Success by less than a certain amount (and failures by any amount) would increase the DC for all other castings until a period dependent on how difficult / complex the spell was. </p><p></p><p>In any case, as I mentioned it will be a while before I finish anything, but I have hopes that the system will work. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Skill based magic has its own difficulties that have to be considered, of course. Unless there is something to increase the DC over time (either temporarily or until the next full period of rest, etc) then it becomes little better than a warlock magic system (ie: infinite casting). While in combat situations that can be managed by lowering overall effectiveness, it does not work so well outside of combat. For example, being able to heal 1 hp at will is of little aid in combat - especially beyond first or second level, but being able to heal 20 hp at will is significant even at high levels. Similarly, dealing 1d10 dmg at will is powerful at low levels but of little worth at high levels, while 10d10 at will is too powerful at nearly any level except pre-epic (and sometimes even then). </p><p></p><p>Generally, you have to find a balance, an advancement rate quite different from what you are typically used to in normal 3.5e D&D. I would also suggest using 2d10 instead of 1d20, as otherwise even the most skilled wizard will fail on even the simplest spells at least 5% of the time. With 2d10 there is very little chance of failing on such trivial spells (and also very little chance of success on spells way beyond their current level) - thus keeping the feel of the wizard as being near or about a certain level, rather than just random skill in whatever he is casting at the moment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyeshet, post: 3525917, member: 18363"] Elements of Magic is not BESM. It is a totally separate / different d20 sourcebook. Source book[b]s[/b], actually, as there are two books on point based system and one on a skill based system. Personally, I like both - far and above the slot system, but I think a synthesis of the two might work better. I'm working on a few ideas, but it will likely be a while before there is anything to playtest. The general idea is that magic would use Complex Skill Checks (sort of like what is defined in the UA; ie: multiple skill checks for a single success). Failures and (to a far lesser extent) Near Failures would drain the mana points, eventually bringing about fatigue, exhaustion, etc - rather like major draining of wound points (another house rule). Success by less than a certain amount (and failures by any amount) would increase the DC for all other castings until a period dependent on how difficult / complex the spell was. In any case, as I mentioned it will be a while before I finish anything, but I have hopes that the system will work. Skill based magic has its own difficulties that have to be considered, of course. Unless there is something to increase the DC over time (either temporarily or until the next full period of rest, etc) then it becomes little better than a warlock magic system (ie: infinite casting). While in combat situations that can be managed by lowering overall effectiveness, it does not work so well outside of combat. For example, being able to heal 1 hp at will is of little aid in combat - especially beyond first or second level, but being able to heal 20 hp at will is significant even at high levels. Similarly, dealing 1d10 dmg at will is powerful at low levels but of little worth at high levels, while 10d10 at will is too powerful at nearly any level except pre-epic (and sometimes even then). Generally, you have to find a balance, an advancement rate quite different from what you are typically used to in normal 3.5e D&D. I would also suggest using 2d10 instead of 1d20, as otherwise even the most skilled wizard will fail on even the simplest spells at least 5% of the time. With 2d10 there is very little chance of failing on such trivial spells (and also very little chance of success on spells way beyond their current level) - thus keeping the feel of the wizard as being near or about a certain level, rather than just random skill in whatever he is casting at the moment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Magic as a skill system
Top