Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Storyteller Hero" data-source="post: 7327931" data-attributes="member: 6813635">One might assume that any and all detection, or related gathering of knowledge, is expressed in the tingling of one's unmentionable areas.If not, then a punch is just a punch, and nobody is actually touching the target's nose as it breaks.Therein lies the conundrum that leads one to a quandary over the reality of spoon versus the desires of fork, and whether it is ethical to marry such utensils for the sake of giving birth to the much beloved and much maligned &quot;spork&quot;.EDIT: Some effects don't need to ask if an undead is undead, and some do. Common sense applies to judging this. The basic question to ask oneself is &quot;would an illusion matter?&quot; - such as a Mace of Disruption that deals harmful effects to undead even if they're disguised as something else, because a disguise is just that and nothing more.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Storyteller Hero, post: 7327931, member: 6813635"] One might assume that any and all detection, or related gathering of knowledge, is expressed in the tingling of one's unmentionable areas. If not, then a punch is just a punch, and nobody is actually touching the target's nose as it breaks. Therein lies the conundrum that leads one to a quandary over the reality of spoon versus the desires of fork, and whether it is ethical to marry such utensils for the sake of giving birth to the much beloved and much maligned "spork". EDIT: Some effects don't need to ask if an undead is undead, and some do. Common sense applies to judging this. The basic question to ask oneself is "would an illusion matter?" - such as a Mace of Disruption that deals harmful effects to undead even if they're disguised as something else, because a disguise is just that and nothing more. [/QUOTE]

Verification