Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Magic item rarity revision forthcoming?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 5403457" data-attributes="member: 8158"><p>Well, if a player were to make the jump from playing weapon-users to an implement-user, here are the adjustments he'd need to make...</p><p></p><p>* Get used to doing d6's and d8's as your base damage.</p><p>* Get familiar what the word "resist" means.</p><p>* Get used to the idea that when you take a feat that grants a damage bonus, it won't apply to every single one of your attacks.</p><p>* Don't fuss over getting an item for every body slot anymore, as they won't dramatically improve your character's attack output. </p><p>* If you want a basic attack, you have to expend one of your two at-will power selections to get it, and even so it will be weak. </p><p></p><p>There's also more nitpicky stuff, like not having the ability to customize his attack so that it gets high crit or brutal or an extra +1 to hit, but if I kept going on I'd just wind up diluting the major flaws, which are those above. Basically, his base damage will start lower than a weapon-user's, and he'll fall farther behind as feats and items broaden the gap.</p><p></p><p>Realize, these are universal adjustments he'd need to make, not class-specifc ones. Some clever ducky no doubt is going to be tempted to play <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />-for-tat about how an implement-user transitioning to weapon-user would have to get used to not being able to blast five opponents at once, but the truth is most implement users can't actually do that either, as bursts and blasts are predominantly 3x3.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's the thing to bear in mind: all classes can do stuff. </p><p></p><p>If a character doesn't have a daily power that creates a zone or wall of flame, then he has some other daily power in that slot instead that does something spiffy in its own right. And that's true whether or not that character uses implements, weapons, or both. </p><p></p><p>Let me make it even more straightforward. If my implement-wielding character fires off a bolt of flame as an encounter power, on what basis should I be doing only 2d6 or 2d8 while some other guy with a bow is doing 2d12 with his encounter attack, and yet another dude with a mordenkrad is doing 6d6 with brutal 1? Because somehere on my class's list of powers I have an option to make a zone or a wall (that I didn't exercise because I picked the flame bolt instead)? What does that have to do with it? </p><p></p><p>* We're all making a single-target attack, so that's a push. </p><p>* The flame bolt probably has some kicker effect like splash damage or dazing, but the other guys' weapon attacks have kickers too, so that's also a push.</p><p>* I'm targeting reflex while they're targeting AC, but then again I'm not getting a +2 proficiency bonus either. Some monsters might have really low reflex, but others have really high reflex, but most of the time it's 2 less than their AC (imagine that), so let's write this off as another push.</p><p>* Our ranges are all over the place: ranged 10 for me, ranged 20/40 for the bowman, and melee for hammerdude. Maybe hammerdude should have an edge, but by that logic shouldn't I have an edge on the bowman?</p><p></p><p>OTOH, if I lob an area burst 10 that stuns every creature it hits, then yeah, I can see where I oughta be taking the shaft on damage. But that's because of what the attack itself is doing, not because I'm using an implement to deliver it.</p><p></p><p>This is a blockbuster of a game balance issue, and if folks had to choose one thing to get upset over with 4e, this should be it.</p><p></p><p>Instead, nobody really gives a damn. Go figure. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/worried.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-S" title="Uhm :-S" data-shortname=":-S" /><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/ponder.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":hmm:" title="Hmmm :hmm:" data-shortname=":hmm:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felon, post: 5403457, member: 8158"] Well, if a player were to make the jump from playing weapon-users to an implement-user, here are the adjustments he'd need to make... * Get used to doing d6's and d8's as your base damage. * Get familiar what the word "resist" means. * Get used to the idea that when you take a feat that grants a damage bonus, it won't apply to every single one of your attacks. * Don't fuss over getting an item for every body slot anymore, as they won't dramatically improve your character's attack output. * If you want a basic attack, you have to expend one of your two at-will power selections to get it, and even so it will be weak. There's also more nitpicky stuff, like not having the ability to customize his attack so that it gets high crit or brutal or an extra +1 to hit, but if I kept going on I'd just wind up diluting the major flaws, which are those above. Basically, his base damage will start lower than a weapon-user's, and he'll fall farther behind as feats and items broaden the gap. Realize, these are universal adjustments he'd need to make, not class-specifc ones. Some clever ducky no doubt is going to be tempted to play :):):)-for-tat about how an implement-user transitioning to weapon-user would have to get used to not being able to blast five opponents at once, but the truth is most implement users can't actually do that either, as bursts and blasts are predominantly 3x3. Here's the thing to bear in mind: all classes can do stuff. If a character doesn't have a daily power that creates a zone or wall of flame, then he has some other daily power in that slot instead that does something spiffy in its own right. And that's true whether or not that character uses implements, weapons, or both. Let me make it even more straightforward. If my implement-wielding character fires off a bolt of flame as an encounter power, on what basis should I be doing only 2d6 or 2d8 while some other guy with a bow is doing 2d12 with his encounter attack, and yet another dude with a mordenkrad is doing 6d6 with brutal 1? Because somehere on my class's list of powers I have an option to make a zone or a wall (that I didn't exercise because I picked the flame bolt instead)? What does that have to do with it? * We're all making a single-target attack, so that's a push. * The flame bolt probably has some kicker effect like splash damage or dazing, but the other guys' weapon attacks have kickers too, so that's also a push. * I'm targeting reflex while they're targeting AC, but then again I'm not getting a +2 proficiency bonus either. Some monsters might have really low reflex, but others have really high reflex, but most of the time it's 2 less than their AC (imagine that), so let's write this off as another push. * Our ranges are all over the place: ranged 10 for me, ranged 20/40 for the bowman, and melee for hammerdude. Maybe hammerdude should have an edge, but by that logic shouldn't I have an edge on the bowman? OTOH, if I lob an area burst 10 that stuns every creature it hits, then yeah, I can see where I oughta be taking the shaft on damage. But that's because of what the attack itself is doing, not because I'm using an implement to deliver it. This is a blockbuster of a game balance issue, and if folks had to choose one thing to get upset over with 4e, this should be it. Instead, nobody really gives a damn. Go figure. :(:-S:hmm::confused: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Magic item rarity revision forthcoming?
Top