Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 757145" data-attributes="member: 5100">Actually, I've found bags of holding to be somewhat over-rated.&nbsp; The only characters that really need them seem to be the ones with a low enough strength that they are _still_ encumbered by the bag.I actually had a chance at one and turned it down.&nbsp; Of course, this was the sorcerer who had devised 4th and 5th level variants for the Shrink Item spell (4th allowed magic items, 5th was as normal but permanent) and had all version, including the original turn the item into a playing card, rather than a piece of cloth.Now, the bag of devouring, _that's_ an item everyone should have.&nbsp; Very useful for cleaning things up.&nbsp; The above character kept one as a pet.&nbsp; He only got it after the party wizard had left his spell book in it overnight, though. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:"&nbsp; data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 757145, member: 5100"] Actually, I've found bags of holding to be somewhat over-rated. The only characters that really need them seem to be the ones with a low enough strength that they are _still_ encumbered by the bag. I actually had a chance at one and turned it down. Of course, this was the sorcerer who had devised 4th and 5th level variants for the Shrink Item spell (4th allowed magic items, 5th was as normal but permanent) and had all version, including the original turn the item into a playing card, rather than a piece of cloth. Now, the bag of devouring, _that's_ an item everyone should have. Very useful for cleaning things up. The above character kept one as a pet. He only got it after the party wizard had left his spell book in it overnight, though. :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]

Verification