Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Beholder Bob" data-source="post: 1415462" data-attributes="member: 12866">I like your DMs rule - and am adopting it myself!&nbsp; If I (as DM) modified a rule in mid-game, I'd make all prior owned items function as they had prior to the rule change - so as not to fudge up a player - but that is the only concession he need make.&nbsp; I also like Scion's items that still grant the full bonus to anyone, but at higher price.Is your problem with it that it impacts an item your PC owns?&nbsp; A fellow PC owns?&nbsp; If not, what is the problem?&nbsp; As is, the +5 skill items are overly powerful (what wizard wouldn't want a +5 concentration item?) and can easily overshadow the skill monkeys in the group - and this change partially reverses it.&nbsp; Nothing stops a PC from developing his skill points in the area the item grants - eventually gaining full use from it.B<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devious.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":]" title="Devious&nbsp; &nbsp; :]" data-shortname=":]" />b</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Beholder Bob, post: 1415462, member: 12866"] I like your DMs rule - and am adopting it myself! If I (as DM) modified a rule in mid-game, I'd make all prior owned items function as they had prior to the rule change - so as not to fudge up a player - but that is the only concession he need make. I also like Scion's items that still grant the full bonus to anyone, but at higher price. Is your problem with it that it impacts an item your PC owns? A fellow PC owns? If not, what is the problem? As is, the +5 skill items are overly powerful (what wizard wouldn't want a +5 concentration item?) and can easily overshadow the skill monkeys in the group - and this change partially reverses it. Nothing stops a PC from developing his skill points in the area the item grants - eventually gaining full use from it. B:]b [/QUOTE]

Verification