Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Magic Missile vs. Mirror Image
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7111135" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>Caster and martial both 'target' (mentally choose) who they are trying to affect with 100% certainty. In each case the target is 'the guy with all the images'.</p><p></p><p>Caster and target are both equally unaffected by the images if they use a method of attack which does not require actual 'aiming' at their chosen target, and both are equally affected by the images if they use a method of attack which requires an attack roll. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh my goodness! You just did exactly the same thing when debating Cognomen's Cassowary! You Posted several dictionary definitions and ignored the ones that disproved your own claim!</p><p></p><p>Here, I said, "Where you are going wrong (inadvertently or deliberately, it's hard to tell) is that you cannot or will not separate the two. <strong>You think that 'target' and 'aim at' are <em>ALWAYS</em> synonyms</strong>." Then, you post a list of synonyms, <strong>one</strong> of which <strong>is</strong> a synonym of a literal, physical aiming like a sniper looking down a scope, and others which do <strong>not</strong> mean that!</p><p></p><p>In D&D, since it first appeared, creatures 'target=earmark' by mentally choosing. <strong>Some</strong> of those targeted must <strong>also</strong> be 'aimed at' by means of an attack roll, but some of those do <strong>not</strong> require being 'aimed' at all!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>D&D literally always, throughout its existence, has used 'target' to mean 'earmark' with 100% certainty, which <em>may or may not</em> also require physically aiming at.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When a politician 'aims' to influence a target constituency he is not literally 'aiming' in the sense of looking down a sniper scope and requiring line-of-sight and good vision. He is 'aiming' in the sense of mentally choosing, 'earmarking', a group that he probably isn't even looking at.</p><p></p><p>In D&D, all that is required to 'target' a creature is that you can see the creature, you have a clear path to it, and it is within range of the thing you want to do.</p><p></p><p>Whether or not a creature has <em>mirror image</em> on, that creature can be seen. It looks like several copies of one creature. They literally cannot look different from each other! That is a creature you can see and 'target/earmark' for whatever you want to do, and if the thing you want to do does not require physically aiming at (attack roll) you simply do not need to know which is the real image, because you are affecting the 'creature' even if that creature has four images.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7111135, member: 6799649"] Caster and martial both 'target' (mentally choose) who they are trying to affect with 100% certainty. In each case the target is 'the guy with all the images'. Caster and target are both equally unaffected by the images if they use a method of attack which does not require actual 'aiming' at their chosen target, and both are equally affected by the images if they use a method of attack which requires an attack roll. Oh my goodness! You just did exactly the same thing when debating Cognomen's Cassowary! You Posted several dictionary definitions and ignored the ones that disproved your own claim! Here, I said, "Where you are going wrong (inadvertently or deliberately, it's hard to tell) is that you cannot or will not separate the two. [b]You think that 'target' and 'aim at' are [i]ALWAYS[/i] synonyms[/b]." Then, you post a list of synonyms, [b]one[/b] of which [b]is[/b] a synonym of a literal, physical aiming like a sniper looking down a scope, and others which do [b]not[/b] mean that! In D&D, since it first appeared, creatures 'target=earmark' by mentally choosing. [b]Some[/b] of those targeted must [b]also[/b] be 'aimed at' by means of an attack roll, but some of those do [b]not[/b] require being 'aimed' at all! D&D literally always, throughout its existence, has used 'target' to mean 'earmark' with 100% certainty, which [i]may or may not[/i] also require physically aiming at. When a politician 'aims' to influence a target constituency he is not literally 'aiming' in the sense of looking down a sniper scope and requiring line-of-sight and good vision. He is 'aiming' in the sense of mentally choosing, 'earmarking', a group that he probably isn't even looking at. In D&D, all that is required to 'target' a creature is that you can see the creature, you have a clear path to it, and it is within range of the thing you want to do. Whether or not a creature has [i]mirror image[/i] on, that creature can be seen. It looks like several copies of one creature. They literally cannot look different from each other! That is a creature you can see and 'target/earmark' for whatever you want to do, and if the thing you want to do does not require physically aiming at (attack roll) you simply do not need to know which is the real image, because you are affecting the 'creature' even if that creature has four images. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Magic Missile vs. Mirror Image
Top