Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mike Sullivan" data-source="post: 884939" data-attributes="member: 9824">Dude, I don't need a lecture on how D&amp;D stacking rules work.I don't argue intent, because, first, it's impossible to take a well-supported opinion on, and, second, why should I care what the designer's intent is?My intent is that the &quot;no stacking beyond +5&quot; rule is stupid, and I'd ignore it (as I mentioned earlier in this thread) in my games.&nbsp; I note, as a matter of academic interest, that by the unambiguous (whether intentional or no) phrasing of the rules of Magic Vestment, the only supported reading of those rules is that it will not stack past +5 with any kind of bonus, enhancement or no.I don't advocate that anybody follow that rule.&nbsp; Nor do I advocate that anybody not follow that rule, because what y'all do in your own games is really a big pile of None of My Business.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mike Sullivan, post: 884939, member: 9824"] Dude, I don't need a lecture on how D&D stacking rules work. I don't argue intent, because, first, it's impossible to take a well-supported opinion on, and, second, why should I care what the designer's intent is? [i]My[/i] intent is that the "no stacking beyond +5" rule is stupid, and I'd ignore it (as I mentioned earlier in this thread) in my games. I note, as a matter of academic interest, that by the unambiguous (whether intentional or no) phrasing of the rules of [i]Magic Vestment[/i], the only supported reading of those rules is that it will not stack past +5 with any kind of bonus, enhancement or no. I don't advocate that anybody follow that rule. Nor do I advocate that anybody not follow that rule, because what y'all do in your own games is really a big pile of None of My Business. [/QUOTE]

Verification