Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 885037" data-attributes="member: 2829">My intention wasn't to give you a lecture. My intention was to provide a simple rebuttal. There's no reason to get upset about it.So far, my argument of intent is heavily supported by the rules, at least, it is from my point of view.Because the point of a discussion is to get the input of others thoughts on the matter? It makes me wonder if you may not be interested in anyone's thoughts on the subject beside your own, even those that designed the rules themselves. If that's the case, why are you here?Well, that's the rule. Nonepic armor simply can't have an enhancement bonus beyond +5 (unless its an artifact, of course).That's fine, but that would be a house rule, and not applicable to the discussion at hand.I know what you note. I just disagree with you.Of course. I understand that. But we aren't talking about anyone's particular games. We're just talking about the rules here.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kreynolds, post: 885037, member: 2829"] My intention wasn't to give you a lecture. My intention was to provide a simple rebuttal. There's no reason to get upset about it. So far, my argument of intent is heavily supported by the rules, at least, it is from my point of view. Because the point of a discussion is to get the input of others thoughts on the matter? It makes me wonder if you may not be interested in anyone's thoughts on the subject beside your own, even those that designed the rules themselves. If that's the case, why are you here? Well, that's the rule. Nonepic armor simply can't have an enhancement bonus beyond +5 (unless its an artifact, of course). That's fine, but that would be a house rule, and not applicable to the discussion at hand. I know what you note. I just disagree with you. Of course. I understand that. But we aren't talking about anyone's particular games. We're just talking about the rules here. [/QUOTE]

Verification