Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Magic Weapons and Keyword Inheritance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4343999" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>All keywords apply. It does not give the keyword to the class or racial power... nor does the class or racial power give its keyword to the daily power.</p><p></p><p>Does a Brute Strike used with a vorpal weapon's power suddenly make that item power Reliable? No. Of course not.</p><p></p><p></p><p>However, if an enemy had vulnerability 5 to reliable, than the damage from the vorpal blade's power would also affect that vulnerability, because the -damage- applies the keywords of all powers contributing to it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What you are doing is taking the words 'The keywords of the item's power and the other power all apply' and changing them to mean 'The keywords on the item are given to the other power.' That is -not- what it says at all. It is mentioning the -effect- of the power's combining. The item does not -effect- the class or racial power, it -effects- its target. In the case of flaming's at-will power, the -target- is the sword itself. This gives the sword's damage the fire keyword. It does not target any enemy whatsoever. So, while an enemy is taking damage with the fire keyword when you use this weapon, it is not being targeted by -any powers- with the fire keyword. That distinction is important.</p><p></p><p>For example, let's say you had an ability that had the Poison keyword, but dealt non-typed damage and had a debilitating effect. You use this on an enemy with vulnerability 10 to poison.</p><p></p><p>The enemy does not take 10 extra damage, because the -damage type- is what vulnerability is triggered by, not powers targetting it.</p><p></p><p>This also matters for ongoing damage. Ongoing damage caused by a power using a weapon's at-will ability gains the type of the weapon's damage, because it's -damage-. This means that if you have two powers that deal ongoing damage, and a frost weapon, you can use it's at-will to change the damage to cold damage, deal the ongoing damage with the first power and -have- it be cold damage, then spend an action point, cancel the weapon's at-will to make the damage normal again, and deal untyped ongoing damage, and have -both- stack on the target when normally that would not happen.</p><p></p><p>Damage type keywords and power keywords are not the same thing. A cold power is not automatically cold damaging, just like a poison power is not automatically poison damaging. It just usually works that way.</p><p></p><p>Powers don't inherit keywords from other powers, -effects- do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, any statement that says 'flaming weapons always do fire damage' is completely ignoring one of their powers explicitly states you have the ability to turn that crap off, and that you explicitly use a free action to turn that crap on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 4343999, member: 71571"] All keywords apply. It does not give the keyword to the class or racial power... nor does the class or racial power give its keyword to the daily power. Does a Brute Strike used with a vorpal weapon's power suddenly make that item power Reliable? No. Of course not. However, if an enemy had vulnerability 5 to reliable, than the damage from the vorpal blade's power would also affect that vulnerability, because the -damage- applies the keywords of all powers contributing to it. What you are doing is taking the words 'The keywords of the item's power and the other power all apply' and changing them to mean 'The keywords on the item are given to the other power.' That is -not- what it says at all. It is mentioning the -effect- of the power's combining. The item does not -effect- the class or racial power, it -effects- its target. In the case of flaming's at-will power, the -target- is the sword itself. This gives the sword's damage the fire keyword. It does not target any enemy whatsoever. So, while an enemy is taking damage with the fire keyword when you use this weapon, it is not being targeted by -any powers- with the fire keyword. That distinction is important. For example, let's say you had an ability that had the Poison keyword, but dealt non-typed damage and had a debilitating effect. You use this on an enemy with vulnerability 10 to poison. The enemy does not take 10 extra damage, because the -damage type- is what vulnerability is triggered by, not powers targetting it. This also matters for ongoing damage. Ongoing damage caused by a power using a weapon's at-will ability gains the type of the weapon's damage, because it's -damage-. This means that if you have two powers that deal ongoing damage, and a frost weapon, you can use it's at-will to change the damage to cold damage, deal the ongoing damage with the first power and -have- it be cold damage, then spend an action point, cancel the weapon's at-will to make the damage normal again, and deal untyped ongoing damage, and have -both- stack on the target when normally that would not happen. Damage type keywords and power keywords are not the same thing. A cold power is not automatically cold damaging, just like a poison power is not automatically poison damaging. It just usually works that way. Powers don't inherit keywords from other powers, -effects- do. Also, any statement that says 'flaming weapons always do fire damage' is completely ignoring one of their powers explicitly states you have the ability to turn that crap off, and that you explicitly use a free action to turn that crap on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Magic Weapons and Keyword Inheritance
Top