Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Magical adept level 1 spell.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7591301" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>Again, it varies with what criteria one wants to focus on. </p><p></p><p>In response to my observation about an owl within 30' of thecdnrmy bring vulnerable, you referenced both melee foes and enemies focused in melee.</p><p></p><p>I then specifically called out non-ranged adversaries. Basically, you seem to want to refute the vulnerability of the familiar at the ranges it needs to be to do its flyby help with "melee foes" at one point and use "melee focused" as your reference for assessment.</p><p></p><p>But my goal posts remain the same- what can attack and kill the familiar. See, that way, I font hsve to fuss with vague definitions of what "focused" means. </p><p></p><p>I wont claim to have run through all of the WotC adventures and done an exhaustive analysis, but I have read thru most of them, I borrow a lot for my homebrew.</p><p></p><p>Taking PotA as a case in point, looking thtubthrir monsters sction ehich fntsils mske of the key foes used thought the main plot, including their minions, it's like 5 to 1 ration between NPCs thst csn strike st a owl that is at 30' with a means of killing itand those who cannot. The ones that cannot are essentially their monks and heavy knights mostly.</p><p></p><p>So, of scenarios using those creatures specifically called out in the products core list - dedicated chapter - it would only be encounters that used only about 20% of those and only when it was just them. </p><p></p><p>Having also drawn more than a bit from that product, I can easily say that I would be shocked if "most " of their combat encounters of any significant challenge at all were actually gonna fit that bill. (So, not just counting fntries here, but also looking st how they were used,)</p><p></p><p>But, hey, if when you run them, most of the encounters festure only enemies who csnnot threaten the flyby familiars without ready actions - that can definitely help frame your viewpoints on familiars.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7591301, member: 6919838"] Again, it varies with what criteria one wants to focus on. In response to my observation about an owl within 30' of thecdnrmy bring vulnerable, you referenced both melee foes and enemies focused in melee. I then specifically called out non-ranged adversaries. Basically, you seem to want to refute the vulnerability of the familiar at the ranges it needs to be to do its flyby help with "melee foes" at one point and use "melee focused" as your reference for assessment. But my goal posts remain the same- what can attack and kill the familiar. See, that way, I font hsve to fuss with vague definitions of what "focused" means. I wont claim to have run through all of the WotC adventures and done an exhaustive analysis, but I have read thru most of them, I borrow a lot for my homebrew. Taking PotA as a case in point, looking thtubthrir monsters sction ehich fntsils mske of the key foes used thought the main plot, including their minions, it's like 5 to 1 ration between NPCs thst csn strike st a owl that is at 30' with a means of killing itand those who cannot. The ones that cannot are essentially their monks and heavy knights mostly. So, of scenarios using those creatures specifically called out in the products core list - dedicated chapter - it would only be encounters that used only about 20% of those and only when it was just them. Having also drawn more than a bit from that product, I can easily say that I would be shocked if "most " of their combat encounters of any significant challenge at all were actually gonna fit that bill. (So, not just counting fntries here, but also looking st how they were used,) But, hey, if when you run them, most of the encounters festure only enemies who csnnot threaten the flyby familiars without ready actions - that can definitely help frame your viewpoints on familiars. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Magical adept level 1 spell.
Top