Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Major Image (Spell): When should a creature use its action to examine something that it believes is real?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 7218649" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>In general, you have cause to investigate something whenever you think that the chance of something being an illusion is significantly higher than the chance of it being real. Illusionists might be rare, but they do exist within the game world; maybe you ballpark a one-in-a-million chance that any given object of interest you see is an illusion. In that case, you should try to disbelieve anything you see that is substantially <em>less</em> likely than one-in-a-million. If you have reason to suspect that an illusionist is nearby, then that increases the base odds of something being an illusion, so it lowers the threshold of skepticism before deciding that something warrants investigation.</p><p></p><p>If you've ever played D&D back in the day, it became something of a habit for players to try and disbelieve anything that seemed too implausible. If you're wandering through a volcano and you encounter a snowman, then you know something weird is going on, so you will probably stop and investigate to find out whether it's an illusion or magical item or some sort of trap. If the only bridge across a moat to an enemy castle is suspiciously unguarded, then you know something weird is going on, so you will probably stop and investigate to find out whether it's an illusion or some sort of trap. Around these parts, that investigation usually comes in the form of shooting it to see whether it reacts or if the arrow simply passes through.</p><p></p><p>Depending on the player and their base level of skepticism - and what sorts of DMs they've been subject to in the past - they may opt to investigate <em>everything</em>. If you've ever seen a player stop and poke <em>everything</em> in the dungeon with a ten-foot pole before getting close to it, then that's probably a player who estimates a fairly significant chance that <em>something</em> isn't what it seems, even when they have no obvious <em>reason</em> to suspect that thing in particular; they wouldn't waste their own time if they didn't expect it to yield results.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 7218649, member: 6775031"] In general, you have cause to investigate something whenever you think that the chance of something being an illusion is significantly higher than the chance of it being real. Illusionists might be rare, but they do exist within the game world; maybe you ballpark a one-in-a-million chance that any given object of interest you see is an illusion. In that case, you should try to disbelieve anything you see that is substantially [I]less[/I] likely than one-in-a-million. If you have reason to suspect that an illusionist is nearby, then that increases the base odds of something being an illusion, so it lowers the threshold of skepticism before deciding that something warrants investigation. If you've ever played D&D back in the day, it became something of a habit for players to try and disbelieve anything that seemed too implausible. If you're wandering through a volcano and you encounter a snowman, then you know something weird is going on, so you will probably stop and investigate to find out whether it's an illusion or magical item or some sort of trap. If the only bridge across a moat to an enemy castle is suspiciously unguarded, then you know something weird is going on, so you will probably stop and investigate to find out whether it's an illusion or some sort of trap. Around these parts, that investigation usually comes in the form of shooting it to see whether it reacts or if the arrow simply passes through. Depending on the player and their base level of skepticism - and what sorts of DMs they've been subject to in the past - they may opt to investigate [I]everything[/I]. If you've ever seen a player stop and poke [I]everything[/I] in the dungeon with a ten-foot pole before getting close to it, then that's probably a player who estimates a fairly significant chance that [I]something[/I] isn't what it seems, even when they have no obvious [I]reason[/I] to suspect that thing in particular; they wouldn't waste their own time if they didn't expect it to yield results. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Major Image (Spell): When should a creature use its action to examine something that it believes is real?
Top