Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="overgeeked" data-source="post: 8507815" data-attributes="member: 86653">OD&amp;D. The DIY attitude and the gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel. The settings.B/X. How clean and straightforward the rules were, how quickly you can create characters, how smooth and fast actual play is, and the gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel. The settings.AD&amp;D 1E. The gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel. The settings.AD&amp;D 2E. Monster ecology and settings.3X. Maybe prestige classes and epic destinies? I never played 3X. The settings.4E. Almost everything except how it actually played at the table and a few odd assumptions about play and advancement.5E. Advantage and disadvantage.Up until a few years ago my ultimate edition of D&amp;D was 4E without the focus on map-bound tactical skirmishes, but adding in the gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel of earlier editions. But lately, I'd rather see Arneson's original notes that he sent to Gygax and play that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="overgeeked, post: 8507815, member: 86653"] [B]OD&D.[/B] The DIY attitude and the gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel. The settings. [B]B/X.[/B] How clean and straightforward the rules were, how quickly you can create characters, how smooth and fast actual play is, and the gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel. The settings. [B]AD&D 1E.[/B] The gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel. The settings. [B]AD&D 2E.[/B] Monster ecology and settings. [B]3X.[/B] Maybe prestige classes and epic destinies? I never played 3X. The settings. [B]4E.[/B] Almost [I]everything[/I] except how it actually played at the table and a few odd assumptions about play and advancement. [B]5E.[/B] Advantage and disadvantage. Up until a few years ago my ultimate edition of D&D was 4E without the focus on map-bound tactical skirmishes, but adding in the gonzo, weird, science fantasy feel of earlier editions. But lately, I'd rather see Arneson's original notes that he sent to Gygax and play that. [/QUOTE]

Verification