Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jmartkdr2" data-source="post: 8507947" data-attributes="member: 7017304">OD&amp;D- never playedBECMI - gradual expansion of options. A first level fighter shouldn't need to choose what kind of fighter they are just yet. 1e - Capping major advancement at 9th or 10th, and then only small increases.2e - never played. There's a lot of good settings to borrow from, though.3e - prestige classes. Late 3.5 had some really creative new classes as well, some of which were forgotten but deserve to come back IMO (like shadowcaster)4e - paragon paths and epic destinies. Skill proficiency being a +5.5e - most of the actual core rules would come form here. For myself as an ideal player, I'd just want Pathfinder 2e. But for many of the people I play with, and more incremental way to handle character building and growth would make for a much better experience - easier to learn and more connection between story and advancement.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jmartkdr2, post: 8507947, member: 7017304"] OD&D- never played BECMI - gradual expansion of options. A first level fighter shouldn't need to choose what kind of fighter they are just yet. 1e - Capping major advancement at 9th or 10th, and then only small increases. 2e - never played. There's a lot of good settings to borrow from, though. 3e - prestige classes. Late 3.5 had some really creative new classes as well, some of which were forgotten but deserve to come back IMO (like shadowcaster) 4e - paragon paths and epic destinies. Skill proficiency being a +5. 5e - most of the actual core rules would come form here. For myself as an ideal player, I'd just want Pathfinder 2e. But for many of the people I play with, and more incremental way to handle character building and growth would make for a much better experience - easier to learn and more connection between story and advancement. [/QUOTE]

Verification