Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Making the Character I Want to Play in 4e (Long)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MyISPHatesENWorld" data-source="post: 4203459" data-attributes="member: 65684"><p>Going back to my first post, this character has been using a greatsword since 1st edition. It has nothing to do with something that is tied to a 3.5 mechanical concept. </p><p></p><p>The mechanics of the game provide a "feel" for a character. Ignoring the mechanics takes away from the fun. Using mechanics you don't like also takes away from the fun.</p><p></p><p>And, I don't see how 3.5 optimization tactics for sneak attack have anything to do with this thread. There are plenty of threads about that though, and several of them would disagree that using two-weapon fighting with a light weapon in combination with sneak attack and/or other additive damage sources is hopelessly gimping a character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The only obsessions in this thread (aside from having a character that has been played for over 25 years) is the people that can't get over the fact that I don't like the Hunter's Quarry ability, the people that can't stop talking about historical weapons facts and the people that can't stop talking about how all I want is to use a sneak attack with a greatsword when I've said that isn't the case - I've even posted a way that might make the character work via a link (to a post in your thread) without any of the rogue powers or abilities (including sneak attack) working with the greatsword that still fits into the character concept and makes the character have the mechanical feel I want it to. It has nothing to do with fluff or flavor text, it has to do with how the powers work mechanically. </p><p></p><p>There might be one more obsession... metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame construcs. That's six times in a three-sentence, one-paragraph post man. As I posted in your thread on what's wrong with people that don't like the way you think they should make their characters in 4e, if you really want to help people as opposed to insulting them because they don't like the same things that you do, look at helping them make the character they want to play, not the character you think they should play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MyISPHatesENWorld, post: 4203459, member: 65684"] Going back to my first post, this character has been using a greatsword since 1st edition. It has nothing to do with something that is tied to a 3.5 mechanical concept. The mechanics of the game provide a "feel" for a character. Ignoring the mechanics takes away from the fun. Using mechanics you don't like also takes away from the fun. And, I don't see how 3.5 optimization tactics for sneak attack have anything to do with this thread. There are plenty of threads about that though, and several of them would disagree that using two-weapon fighting with a light weapon in combination with sneak attack and/or other additive damage sources is hopelessly gimping a character. The only obsessions in this thread (aside from having a character that has been played for over 25 years) is the people that can't get over the fact that I don't like the Hunter's Quarry ability, the people that can't stop talking about historical weapons facts and the people that can't stop talking about how all I want is to use a sneak attack with a greatsword when I've said that isn't the case - I've even posted a way that might make the character work via a link (to a post in your thread) without any of the rogue powers or abilities (including sneak attack) working with the greatsword that still fits into the character concept and makes the character have the mechanical feel I want it to. It has nothing to do with fluff or flavor text, it has to do with how the powers work mechanically. There might be one more obsession... metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame constructs, metagame construcs. That's six times in a three-sentence, one-paragraph post man. As I posted in your thread on what's wrong with people that don't like the way you think they should make their characters in 4e, if you really want to help people as opposed to insulting them because they don't like the same things that you do, look at helping them make the character they want to play, not the character you think they should play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Making the Character I Want to Play in 4e (Long)
Top