Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SkidAce" data-source="post: 7298123" data-attributes="member: 7706">They played totally differently, likely from spell choices and fluff/style.The sorcerer was what you would call a &quot;water of life&quot; wielder, (semi Egyptian flavored for context), had water walking, water breathing, we made acid splash &quot;water or acid&quot; splash, hold person, etc.&nbsp; The custom spells we added were to add cure wounds and create or destroy water from cleric list.The wizard was more of your classic arcane study type of wizard.&nbsp; With an emphasis on detecting, analyzing and blowing stuff up.So in effect, one was a controller and the other was more of a striker.To sum up the answer to your question, yeah, they did choose different spells and styles, they also played them differently in style.Every sorcerer I have seen, played up the internal/some source of innate power so they felt different from wizards.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SkidAce, post: 7298123, member: 7706"] They played totally differently, likely from spell choices and fluff/style. The sorcerer was what you would call a "water of life" wielder, (semi Egyptian flavored for context), had water walking, water breathing, we made acid splash "water or acid" splash, hold person, etc. The custom spells we added were to add cure wounds and create or destroy water from cleric list. The wizard was more of your classic arcane study type of wizard. With an emphasis on detecting, analyzing and blowing stuff up. So in effect, one was a controller and the other was more of a striker. To sum up the answer to your question, yeah, they did choose different spells and styles, they also played them differently in style. Every sorcerer I have seen, played up the internal/some source of innate power so they felt different from wizards. [/QUOTE]

Verification