Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Making Vancian Casting More "Linear" and Less "Quadratic"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 5884900" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>I've never been a big fan of "Vancian" fire-and-forget spellcasting. But they've pretty much put their foot down and inisisted that Vancain casting will be a part of 5e's core rules, and I can't say I'm surprised. Even though alot of people dislike it, it's been one of the game's major traditions going back to the very beginning of the game. I accept that. But if they are going to keep Vancian style casting, there's two simple things they can do to make it much more balanced and address some of the major reasons people like myself dislike it.</p><p></p><p>One of the biggest problems with vancian casting in the past is what people call the "Linear Fighter, Quadratic Wizard." Wizards at very low levels in all editions prior to 4th were, well, pathetic. Wow! Look at me! I'm a 1st level Wizard and I have ONE spell PER DAY! .... Then, on the flipside, a 20th level wizard has so many spells per day it's almost impossible for him to run out. I don't care for either extreme.</p><p></p><p>If they're going to insist on keeping Vancian casting out of tradition, I hope that they at least try to make casters more "linear." Give a 1st level wizard more than one or two freaking spells per day. Give them several, in fact. There's nothing enjoyable about playing a class that has such a limited resource. But they also should greatly reduce the number of spells higher level wizards get, so that they don't become gods. This will make wizards more balanced and fun throughout all levels of play.</p><p></p><p>The other thing I really want to see is the return of at-will basic attacks and cantrips. They've already acknowledged how popular at-will spells are, but I figured I'd mention it anyway. I find Vancian fire-and-forget spellcasting is alot more bearable if I have at least a couple at-will basic attack spells and some at-will cantrips to fall back on when I don't want to waste a good prepared spell. I've had alot of fun with at-will cantrips in both 4e and Pathfinder. They don't unbalance anything at all; they're just fun little tricks that let me feel like I'm a wizard all day long.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 5884900, member: 17077"] I've never been a big fan of "Vancian" fire-and-forget spellcasting. But they've pretty much put their foot down and inisisted that Vancain casting will be a part of 5e's core rules, and I can't say I'm surprised. Even though alot of people dislike it, it's been one of the game's major traditions going back to the very beginning of the game. I accept that. But if they are going to keep Vancian style casting, there's two simple things they can do to make it much more balanced and address some of the major reasons people like myself dislike it. One of the biggest problems with vancian casting in the past is what people call the "Linear Fighter, Quadratic Wizard." Wizards at very low levels in all editions prior to 4th were, well, pathetic. Wow! Look at me! I'm a 1st level Wizard and I have ONE spell PER DAY! .... Then, on the flipside, a 20th level wizard has so many spells per day it's almost impossible for him to run out. I don't care for either extreme. If they're going to insist on keeping Vancian casting out of tradition, I hope that they at least try to make casters more "linear." Give a 1st level wizard more than one or two freaking spells per day. Give them several, in fact. There's nothing enjoyable about playing a class that has such a limited resource. But they also should greatly reduce the number of spells higher level wizards get, so that they don't become gods. This will make wizards more balanced and fun throughout all levels of play. The other thing I really want to see is the return of at-will basic attacks and cantrips. They've already acknowledged how popular at-will spells are, but I figured I'd mention it anyway. I find Vancian fire-and-forget spellcasting is alot more bearable if I have at least a couple at-will basic attack spells and some at-will cantrips to fall back on when I don't want to waste a good prepared spell. I've had alot of fun with at-will cantrips in both 4e and Pathfinder. They don't unbalance anything at all; they're just fun little tricks that let me feel like I'm a wizard all day long. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Making Vancian Casting More "Linear" and Less "Quadratic"
Top