Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Making your own "Sweet Spot"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 3166599" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>I think that something like this could work- with or without Crothian's modification- depending upon the other rules and assumptions in the game.</p><p></p><p>A game with a 3.X-style emphasis on balance at each level would necessitate cooperative leveling.</p><p></p><p>But examine a game like RIFTS (hear me out!) which has a class/level structure like that of 1Ed D&D, in which game balance is not a primary concern. PCs can have radically different abilities at first level, but progress at rates commensurate with their power levels. In other words, a "weaker" PC would advance more quickly than most others, and would improve significantly with each level. Meanwhile a "front-loaded" PC would advance very slowly, and level-based improvements might be only marginal. "1st level" or "10th level," thus, means different things to different PCs. Cooperative leveling might not be neccessary.</p><p></p><p>A game in which PC design is based upon pure archetypes or a point basis, even "leveling up" might be virtually meaningless in the traditional sense. In a game like that (assuming point base) a 250 point Combat Monster archetype will perform radically differently from a 250 point Ultimate Detective archetype. The latter may not even be able to survive 3 seconds on a battlefield the former could sleep on- meanwhile the former would find the Mystery of the Open Bag of Cheetoes completely insoluable even while the latter is surreptitiously wiping his power-orange fingers on the former's cape. Each would improve in their own fields of expertise, but comparison between the two might be meaningless. Cooperative leveling might not be neccessary. In fact, it might be better for the game if PC improvement were story driven- you improve what you used- in a non-discrete, "analog" kind of PC advancement progression. The PC who only uses his combat skills only improves his combat skills, and does so quickly. The PC who uses everything on his sheet on a regular basis might have across the board incremental improvements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 3166599, member: 19675"] I think that something like this could work- with or without Crothian's modification- depending upon the other rules and assumptions in the game. A game with a 3.X-style emphasis on balance at each level would necessitate cooperative leveling. But examine a game like RIFTS (hear me out!) which has a class/level structure like that of 1Ed D&D, in which game balance is not a primary concern. PCs can have radically different abilities at first level, but progress at rates commensurate with their power levels. In other words, a "weaker" PC would advance more quickly than most others, and would improve significantly with each level. Meanwhile a "front-loaded" PC would advance very slowly, and level-based improvements might be only marginal. "1st level" or "10th level," thus, means different things to different PCs. Cooperative leveling might not be neccessary. A game in which PC design is based upon pure archetypes or a point basis, even "leveling up" might be virtually meaningless in the traditional sense. In a game like that (assuming point base) a 250 point Combat Monster archetype will perform radically differently from a 250 point Ultimate Detective archetype. The latter may not even be able to survive 3 seconds on a battlefield the former could sleep on- meanwhile the former would find the Mystery of the Open Bag of Cheetoes completely insoluable even while the latter is surreptitiously wiping his power-orange fingers on the former's cape. Each would improve in their own fields of expertise, but comparison between the two might be meaningless. Cooperative leveling might not be neccessary. In fact, it might be better for the game if PC improvement were story driven- you improve what you used- in a non-discrete, "analog" kind of PC advancement progression. The PC who only uses his combat skills only improves his combat skills, and does so quickly. The PC who uses everything on his sheet on a regular basis might have across the board incremental improvements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Making your own "Sweet Spot"
Top