Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Man, I miss the days of good, solid, utilitarian Prestige Classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 2438921" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Why do the players take prestige classes? Is it because they are looking for something to add to their PC's story, background, motivation, etc? Or is it because they see the PrCls nifty abilities and want a power boost? Or does the PrCl open up some new strategic option?</p><p></p><p>For the concept itself, they are not required to enter a PrCl. Gamers too often assume that if you belong to the Arcane Order the you <em>have</em> to take a level in the associated PrCl, otherwise you're only "about to enter" the group. IOW, that all associates have levels in the PrCl and viceversa, which is quite BS. </p><p></p><p>For power and option I am rather demanding that the game provides them to the base classes, without the need for a PrCl. Feats are much more simple and clean to use: if you just want to be a better archer with a specific trick, you should be able to get it as a feat provided you meet some prerequisites. The original mistake the designers made with feats was to give too few of them.</p><p></p><p>If you build a PrCl around that ability you're complicating the matter a lot. Now you have a whole class, which requires you to balance it about other features (BAB, HD, skills, spellcasting levels...) which have nothing to do with your archer special ability. Furthermore, the requirements designed will fix a minimum char level to qualify which is discriminating for some base classes, and a similar thing happens if the PrCl doesn't provide full BAB or full spellcasting.</p><p>The result is that if your archer PrCl satisfies the party fighter-type, it will be probably uncomfortable for the rogue-type and terribly penalyzing for the caster-type. Then you have to make other new PrCl for those as well...</p><p></p><p>At least if the PrCl shows a clear <em>progression</em> of the features (and not a mere <em>collection</em> of them) then it makes more sense to make it a class. But in general I wish the gaming options weren't so much tied to prestige classes at all. I am quite sure that it would be possible and even easy to break down all prestige classes into feats.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Very good point you make with your example. I think this problem still has to do with how PrCl work, but at least for those who like PrCls there are examples with the Harpers about how to do this: make <em>more</em> PrCl associated with a single organization.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 2438921, member: 1465"] Why do the players take prestige classes? Is it because they are looking for something to add to their PC's story, background, motivation, etc? Or is it because they see the PrCls nifty abilities and want a power boost? Or does the PrCl open up some new strategic option? For the concept itself, they are not required to enter a PrCl. Gamers too often assume that if you belong to the Arcane Order the you [I]have[/I] to take a level in the associated PrCl, otherwise you're only "about to enter" the group. IOW, that all associates have levels in the PrCl and viceversa, which is quite BS. For power and option I am rather demanding that the game provides them to the base classes, without the need for a PrCl. Feats are much more simple and clean to use: if you just want to be a better archer with a specific trick, you should be able to get it as a feat provided you meet some prerequisites. The original mistake the designers made with feats was to give too few of them. If you build a PrCl around that ability you're complicating the matter a lot. Now you have a whole class, which requires you to balance it about other features (BAB, HD, skills, spellcasting levels...) which have nothing to do with your archer special ability. Furthermore, the requirements designed will fix a minimum char level to qualify which is discriminating for some base classes, and a similar thing happens if the PrCl doesn't provide full BAB or full spellcasting. The result is that if your archer PrCl satisfies the party fighter-type, it will be probably uncomfortable for the rogue-type and terribly penalyzing for the caster-type. Then you have to make other new PrCl for those as well... At least if the PrCl shows a clear [I]progression[/I] of the features (and not a mere [I]collection[/I] of them) then it makes more sense to make it a class. But in general I wish the gaming options weren't so much tied to prestige classes at all. I am quite sure that it would be possible and even easy to break down all prestige classes into feats. Very good point you make with your example. I think this problem still has to do with how PrCl work, but at least for those who like PrCls there are examples with the Harpers about how to do this: make [I]more[/I] PrCl associated with a single organization. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Man, I miss the days of good, solid, utilitarian Prestige Classes
Top