Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Manual of the Planes: The Switch to a Standard Multiverse, and Why it Matters (Part 2)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 8005945" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>Personally, I think that there is a difference between arguing on the internet, and discussing ideas. I think some people enjoy reading about the history of the game, seeing a little effort in research, and appreciate some thought on the subject matter. But I am not obligated to argue with every single person who feels very strongly that I am wrong, am I?</p><p></p><p>Now, if you'll notice the first post made by Umbran was basically, "Hey, you ignored all this, and you're totally wrong." Which is fine, that's a great opinion to have! I can be completely wrong.</p><p></p><p>Thing is, that post was in this, and didn't account for the fact that I had already posted a whole third post that accounted for what he said.</p><p></p><p>Shortly thereafter, he made another post saying, "WIth respect, ..... (you're still totally wrong.)" I mean ... why do I even bother writing with sources. If I put effort into the OP (which I do), then they should speak for themselves. I don't have any strong need to defend it when I read what he wrote because it just wasn't interesting to me - it's already answered in the three posts I have written, so I don't think explaining it again is going to make a difference.</p><p></p><p>His disagreement and dislike of what I wrote is totally fine! I am sure he has a strong opinion on things that he wants to argue! I'm not very interested in arguing, however. If someone wants to discuss something, I'm more amenable. For example, I really enjoy discussing the history of the game, and I've been thinking about the particular changes that occurred re: the multiverse early on. But that's not an invitation to argue about things being "good" or "bad" or about editions or what happened with 4e or 5e or 3e; it's beyond the scope of what I was thinking about.</p><p></p><p>If people want to argue about things being good or bad or what should be, I am sure that there are many people that love arguing. Just not me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 8005945, member: 7023840"] Personally, I think that there is a difference between arguing on the internet, and discussing ideas. I think some people enjoy reading about the history of the game, seeing a little effort in research, and appreciate some thought on the subject matter. But I am not obligated to argue with every single person who feels very strongly that I am wrong, am I? Now, if you'll notice the first post made by Umbran was basically, "Hey, you ignored all this, and you're totally wrong." Which is fine, that's a great opinion to have! I can be completely wrong. Thing is, that post was in this, and didn't account for the fact that I had already posted a whole third post that accounted for what he said. Shortly thereafter, he made another post saying, "WIth respect, ..... (you're still totally wrong.)" I mean ... why do I even bother writing with sources. If I put effort into the OP (which I do), then they should speak for themselves. I don't have any strong need to defend it when I read what he wrote because it just wasn't interesting to me - it's already answered in the three posts I have written, so I don't think explaining it again is going to make a difference. His disagreement and dislike of what I wrote is totally fine! I am sure he has a strong opinion on things that he wants to argue! I'm not very interested in arguing, however. If someone wants to discuss something, I'm more amenable. For example, I really enjoy discussing the history of the game, and I've been thinking about the particular changes that occurred re: the multiverse early on. But that's not an invitation to argue about things being "good" or "bad" or about editions or what happened with 4e or 5e or 3e; it's beyond the scope of what I was thinking about. If people want to argue about things being good or bad or what should be, I am sure that there are many people that love arguing. Just not me. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Manual of the Planes: The Switch to a Standard Multiverse, and Why it Matters (Part 2)
Top