Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1464869" data-attributes="member: 2629">I strongly disagree. Flyby attack requires a fly speed, which is a pretty hefty requirement. A feat is a lot easier to gain than a fly speed. Further, it should not be the bottom of a feat chain or have no real prereqs. It is too useful of an addition to the abilities of a PC. Having a feat prerequisite requires you to have a focus on this type of activity before you can just casually pick up the ability to do things while moving. Keep in mind that I use this feat. I have play tested it. It is fine as written. The restrictions are necessary to keep it from being a 'no brainer' in many situations. You need to figure out when it is worth using this feat and when it is better to just use a move action and a standard action. Further, the restrictions help avoid a few hundred rules questions that arose when I introduced this feat. They are a product of play testing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 1464869, member: 2629"] I strongly disagree. Flyby attack requires a fly speed, which is a pretty hefty requirement. A feat is a lot easier to gain than a fly speed. Further, it should not be the bottom of a feat chain or have no real prereqs. It is too useful of an addition to the abilities of a PC. Having a feat prerequisite requires you to have a focus on this type of activity before you can just casually pick up the ability to do things while moving. Keep in mind that I use this feat. I have play tested it. It is fine as written. The restrictions are necessary to keep it from being a 'no brainer' in many situations. You need to figure out when it is worth using this feat and when it is better to just use a move action and a standard action. Further, the restrictions help avoid a few hundred rules questions that arose when I introduced this feat. They are a product of play testing. [/QUOTE]

Verification