Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The-Magic-Sword" data-source="post: 9405076" data-attributes="member: 6801252">It kinda makes sense though, by definition trying to intimidate a group of people at once is harder than intimidating one person, if you do it the way you're describing someone would become better at intimidating groups than they are at individuals because the feat doesn't pertain to individuals, just groups.But if you start from the perspective that coerce exists and is usually single target it makes sense you'd make it harder for a group regardless of if there was a feat. It's not like "it's harder to coerce a group of people to do what you want than it is to coerce a single person to do what you want" is a controversial statement, so what's the alternative?</blockquote>