Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Marketing criticisms miss the point
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Negflar2099" data-source="post: 4290797" data-attributes="member: 65944"><p>For those who don't know ex WotC staffer JD Wiker had a post in his blog where he said that he isn't going to play 4e because WotC botched the marketing but everyone should check out 4e anyway. (I would link to it but A) I don't know how and B) it's on the Enworld front page). </p><p></p><p>While I applaud Mr. Wiker's willingness to be open minded and to remind everyone to be as open minded as he is I have to admit that I'm confused as to why he would stop playing a game because the marketing was botched.</p><p></p><p>First of all I'm not even sure I agree it was botched. This is clearly a situation where the fans are so divided nothing can really appease them. If Wizards had come out with 3.75 as some suggest it would have been met with just as much anger as 4e's arrival. Had they called it 4e but not changed all that much people would be just as angry. Wizards could have continued to produce 3.x books but only for so long, maybe a year more tops, before they've ran out of ideas for sourcebooks people would buy. </p><p></p><p>Even after reading his post I still don't understand what Wizards could have done differently to sell 4e to a fanbase where half of us want to kill sacred cows in order to make what we hope will be a better system and the other half would rather find a way to keep the sacred cows at any cost and improve the system around them. Short of releasing two versions of D&D at the same time (call one D&D: SCI*) or closing the D&D line I don't know what they could have done. </p><p></p><p>WotC certainly made mistakes. I'll agree with you there, but to say there's one perfect way to run it that would have avoided all this hate is sort of missing the point I think. </p><p></p><p>Yet even if I agree they botched the marketing I especially don't understand why you wouldn't play a game you would otherwise play because it was marketed poorly. I don't understand. Maybe someone can explain it to me. I know a lot of movies that could have used better marketing but that I love immensely and I know movies with great marketing that i hated. I don't see making a decision about a game like this based on marketing. Can someone help me understand?</p><p></p><p>*Sacred Cows Intact</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Negflar2099, post: 4290797, member: 65944"] For those who don't know ex WotC staffer JD Wiker had a post in his blog where he said that he isn't going to play 4e because WotC botched the marketing but everyone should check out 4e anyway. (I would link to it but A) I don't know how and B) it's on the Enworld front page). While I applaud Mr. Wiker's willingness to be open minded and to remind everyone to be as open minded as he is I have to admit that I'm confused as to why he would stop playing a game because the marketing was botched. First of all I'm not even sure I agree it was botched. This is clearly a situation where the fans are so divided nothing can really appease them. If Wizards had come out with 3.75 as some suggest it would have been met with just as much anger as 4e's arrival. Had they called it 4e but not changed all that much people would be just as angry. Wizards could have continued to produce 3.x books but only for so long, maybe a year more tops, before they've ran out of ideas for sourcebooks people would buy. Even after reading his post I still don't understand what Wizards could have done differently to sell 4e to a fanbase where half of us want to kill sacred cows in order to make what we hope will be a better system and the other half would rather find a way to keep the sacred cows at any cost and improve the system around them. Short of releasing two versions of D&D at the same time (call one D&D: SCI*) or closing the D&D line I don't know what they could have done. WotC certainly made mistakes. I'll agree with you there, but to say there's one perfect way to run it that would have avoided all this hate is sort of missing the point I think. Yet even if I agree they botched the marketing I especially don't understand why you wouldn't play a game you would otherwise play because it was marketed poorly. I don't understand. Maybe someone can explain it to me. I know a lot of movies that could have used better marketing but that I love immensely and I know movies with great marketing that i hated. I don't see making a decision about a game like this based on marketing. Can someone help me understand? *Sacred Cows Intact [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Marketing criticisms miss the point
Top