Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Marketing criticisms miss the point
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sjmiller" data-source="post: 4291431" data-attributes="member: 17262"><p>And you know, in my opinion, that is where they dropped the ball. The players in my group will have a great deal of difficulty re-creating the "feel" of their 3.0 core-based characters because many aspects of their characters are not possible in core 4e. It's rather like telling someone to re-create the feel of this silk and velvet garment with this homespun cotton and burlap.</p><p>It wouldn't be nearly so bad if they actually made it possible to re-create things like a bard, or a sorcerer, or a necromancer, or any of a host of other things they threw out. It's awfully hard to tell someone that they can't play what they want because the game doesn't support it. Sure, some of it will come out later, but for now they just have to suck up and deal with it, I guess. It's that sort of thing that makes it hard for some people, like myself, to get behind 4e. It has been presented to us as the best thing since the creation of polyhedral dice. From all that I have read in the books so far, I think they missed the mark. I am glad I was given the books, because what they said we would get and what we got are not the same thing, and I would be really upset if I actually had to pay for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sjmiller, post: 4291431, member: 17262"] And you know, in my opinion, that is where they dropped the ball. The players in my group will have a great deal of difficulty re-creating the "feel" of their 3.0 core-based characters because many aspects of their characters are not possible in core 4e. It's rather like telling someone to re-create the feel of this silk and velvet garment with this homespun cotton and burlap. It wouldn't be nearly so bad if they actually made it possible to re-create things like a bard, or a sorcerer, or a necromancer, or any of a host of other things they threw out. It's awfully hard to tell someone that they can't play what they want because the game doesn't support it. Sure, some of it will come out later, but for now they just have to suck up and deal with it, I guess. It's that sort of thing that makes it hard for some people, like myself, to get behind 4e. It has been presented to us as the best thing since the creation of polyhedral dice. From all that I have read in the books so far, I think they missed the mark. I am glad I was given the books, because what they said we would get and what we got are not the same thing, and I would be really upset if I actually had to pay for it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Marketing criticisms miss the point
Top