Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Marks "Attack that does not include you..."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="S'mon" data-source="post: 5590659" data-attributes="member: 463"><p>It's much more fun IMO for the dangerous multi-attacking monster to split attacks between the defender and the squishy PC, rather than focusing all attacks on the defender (and thus taking him down quickly) or focusing all attacks on the squishy PC (and thus taking him down quickly, possibly even killing him) - which latter two are the two possibilities what will happen if attacks on the squishy trigger the mark. Either the monster obeys the mark and focuses on the defender, or ignores the mark and focuses on the squishy.</p><p></p><p>If the mark is not triggered by a split attack on defender + squishy, then the defender has done his job most effectively, he has forced the monster to spread damage around. He takes some damage, but is probably ok. The squishy takes some damage, but is probably still alive.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Although pre-MM3 monsters did so little damage, and fights were so grindy, there was a case for having monsters routinely focus attacks and violate marks, just so that more damage happens overall and PCs feel slightly threatened by the focused attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="S'mon, post: 5590659, member: 463"] It's much more fun IMO for the dangerous multi-attacking monster to split attacks between the defender and the squishy PC, rather than focusing all attacks on the defender (and thus taking him down quickly) or focusing all attacks on the squishy PC (and thus taking him down quickly, possibly even killing him) - which latter two are the two possibilities what will happen if attacks on the squishy trigger the mark. Either the monster obeys the mark and focuses on the defender, or ignores the mark and focuses on the squishy. If the mark is not triggered by a split attack on defender + squishy, then the defender has done his job most effectively, he has forced the monster to spread damage around. He takes some damage, but is probably ok. The squishy takes some damage, but is probably still alive. Edit: Although pre-MM3 monsters did so little damage, and fights were so grindy, there was a case for having monsters routinely focus attacks and violate marks, just so that more damage happens overall and PCs feel slightly threatened by the focused attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Marks "Attack that does not include you..."
Top