Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ruemere" data-source="post: 1019492" data-attributes="member: 5515">Hong,Hmm. It seems to me that I was too vague. Allow me to clarify (to attempt to clarify):Obviously, our approaches differ here as I prefer the feats and skills to reflect details of the character knowledge, not an abstract resultant of aforementioned. And, since both ways are equally viable, I withdraw my criticsm of your class.Not necessarily directly levels. Rather feats and skills, and, as a consequence levels.I lurk therefore I am.Any feat can be deemed broken if used in a combo. Since I know nothing about your campaign, I can only use SRD for my arguments. Hence, I am not really convinced.Any examples?My mistake. Flat-footed would be a better state, don't you think?Anything which yields bonus to attack makes Power Attack option more reasonable, don't you agree? And with the new and improved Power Attack,  to-hit bonuses become more important than before.Thanks.Rapid Strike: "This feat does not give you extra attacks on a full attack."Improved Rapid Strike: "In addition to the extra attack you gain with a full attack action from Rapid Strike, ..."I was under impression that Rapid Strike does not work in full round attacks.YMV, obviously.Regards,Ruemere</blockquote>