NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 8469977" data-attributes="member: 72555">I'd avoid math.Like, 1d8, increasing to 2d8 at level 5, 3d8 at level 11 and 4d8 at level 17.  And the slow version just maximizes the healing.LoH is a combat bonus, as is heavy armor.  As you are adding healing, that can track.The PHB Ranger was considered a bad class by most.  Partly because it was poor at level 1.I am just talking about level 1.  It matters.(Smite at 2 works well, as advised fights/day is low at 2.  And it is 100% accurate.)Only for rangers?  Like, I can imagine a bunch of Ranger style variations.  But only 1 style for 1 class... seems awkward.They said different things.  Maybe I read one or the other wrong.You have an ability that states "using your reaction".  Not a reaction to something, just action economy resource token.Guarding use 5 and 6 of a T3 ability behind anti-multiclassing is needless complexity to solve at best a trivial problem.Doing this for T1 abilities makes sense if you can't manage anything better.  By T3, it is nonsense; you added an extra lookup table to prevent someone who is already more than 50% ranger from getting 6 instead of 4 uses a day of an ability at level 17.Yes, but going from 1d8 to 2d6 here, and 1d6 to 2d6 elsewhere, seems like a typo.   I'd expect 1d8 to 2d8.  Not a die change.The level 11 offensive boosts are not very balanced against each other.  Without design intent info, all I can say is it looks funny.</blockquote>

Verification