Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Martials > Casters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 8016358" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Having reviewed the 5E spells, I have to agree to a point. I felt the 5E wizard was an underwhelming class that did not compete with optimized builds using other classes. We never ran with a single class wizard after the very first adventure because they were not necessary. You did not need a wizard in 5E and there were other more effective classes. A 5E wizard was a bottom tier class with limited customization in the 5E Core Rulebook. Not sure about now with other books. But I have to admit the PF2 wizard is worse insofar as the gap between every other classes' effectiveness and wizard effectiveness is wider, especially so at low levels where most people play.</p><p></p><p>In PF2 summons, shapechanging, and incapacitation spells are terrible compared to 5E. The main place you will shine is higher level AoE damage spells where your damage can reach obscene levels, especially so on a critically failed save. I have seen first hand an arcane caster lich able to blow off his high level damage spells obliterate a party in a way a martial monster cannot. It was painful. But this is with high level DCs and blowing his high level slots without having to worry about them for later fights. But they were spells an arcane caster has access to. </p><p></p><p>And I have heard action limiting spells are effective, though I haven't tried them. And there are still wall spells which can be effective.</p><p></p><p>The biggest problem is getting to that high level because the low level wizard is much less fun to play than a 5E wizard. He is very, very ineffective in the most important fights, which is extremely frustrating. It makes you want to give up. I cannot even say at what level this changes some. I would say maybe 9th to 11th as the 5th and 6th level and above damage spells can be quite nasty, especially given the saving throw success/failure levels. </p><p></p><p>I am hoping some of this is fixed after feedback from the terrible experience of wizard players. Future magic books will hopefully add spell and magic item options that don't make a wizard player feel like such a pathetic weakling. It is sad to see such an iconic class turned into such a pathetic class that isn't particularly fun to play. I would say that is the most egregious failing is that the PF2 wizard isn't fun. Most people could tolerate the power reduction if the wizard had been turned into something fun to play to replace the lost power.</p><p></p><p>Even the sorcerer has interesting ways to build. My undead bloodline sorcerer managing the forces of life and death is more fun than a wizard. I have 1 action damage dealers that are interesting and effective. I can heal when needed. Last combat I was able to heal up the martials with spell slots while using <em>spiritual weapon</em> to attack. The wizard doesn't have options of this kind that are of equivalent effectiveness.</p><p></p><p>The final PF2 wizard seems to suffer for a lack of testing. It seems like Paizo made every effort to ensure the wizard was not the problem it was in PF1 to the point of ruining the class. It is truly the only class in the book I can't see much of a reason to play. The wizard lacks unique and effective abilities that work well within the 3 action PF2 framework. Not sure how the wizard class as is made it past the Paizo testing process in the form it has taken.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 8016358, member: 5834"] Having reviewed the 5E spells, I have to agree to a point. I felt the 5E wizard was an underwhelming class that did not compete with optimized builds using other classes. We never ran with a single class wizard after the very first adventure because they were not necessary. You did not need a wizard in 5E and there were other more effective classes. A 5E wizard was a bottom tier class with limited customization in the 5E Core Rulebook. Not sure about now with other books. But I have to admit the PF2 wizard is worse insofar as the gap between every other classes' effectiveness and wizard effectiveness is wider, especially so at low levels where most people play. In PF2 summons, shapechanging, and incapacitation spells are terrible compared to 5E. The main place you will shine is higher level AoE damage spells where your damage can reach obscene levels, especially so on a critically failed save. I have seen first hand an arcane caster lich able to blow off his high level damage spells obliterate a party in a way a martial monster cannot. It was painful. But this is with high level DCs and blowing his high level slots without having to worry about them for later fights. But they were spells an arcane caster has access to. And I have heard action limiting spells are effective, though I haven't tried them. And there are still wall spells which can be effective. The biggest problem is getting to that high level because the low level wizard is much less fun to play than a 5E wizard. He is very, very ineffective in the most important fights, which is extremely frustrating. It makes you want to give up. I cannot even say at what level this changes some. I would say maybe 9th to 11th as the 5th and 6th level and above damage spells can be quite nasty, especially given the saving throw success/failure levels. I am hoping some of this is fixed after feedback from the terrible experience of wizard players. Future magic books will hopefully add spell and magic item options that don't make a wizard player feel like such a pathetic weakling. It is sad to see such an iconic class turned into such a pathetic class that isn't particularly fun to play. I would say that is the most egregious failing is that the PF2 wizard isn't fun. Most people could tolerate the power reduction if the wizard had been turned into something fun to play to replace the lost power. Even the sorcerer has interesting ways to build. My undead bloodline sorcerer managing the forces of life and death is more fun than a wizard. I have 1 action damage dealers that are interesting and effective. I can heal when needed. Last combat I was able to heal up the martials with spell slots while using [i]spiritual weapon[/i] to attack. The wizard doesn't have options of this kind that are of equivalent effectiveness. The final PF2 wizard seems to suffer for a lack of testing. It seems like Paizo made every effort to ensure the wizard was not the problem it was in PF1 to the point of ruining the class. It is truly the only class in the book I can't see much of a reason to play. The wizard lacks unique and effective abilities that work well within the 3 action PF2 framework. Not sure how the wizard class as is made it past the Paizo testing process in the form it has taken. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Martials > Casters
Top