Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8991038" data-attributes="member: 6790260">So you admit it: the Fighter is, in fact, weaker than most other classes.But buffing it (and other classes strongly similar to it) is not okay.I think we're done here. You have all but explicitly said, "The Fighter is no better than anyone else at its specialization, while others can be better at its specialization, or get most of what it does while also doing a whole bunch of other things." And from this, the one and only so-called solution you will accept is to give all classes 100% identical benefits with no variation.Why? You have already recognized the Fighter—and by extension, the extremely similar Barbarian, Monk, and Rogue—are weak because they critically depend on the Attack action. You have already agreed that spells are simply, objectively a more powerful tool to have, full stop. Why, then, is the one and only valid "solution" to buff everyone equally, so Wizards remain exactly as far ahead of Fighters as they were before? How is that even remotely a compromise?</blockquote>