Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Neo" data-source="post: 1476963" data-attributes="member: 4139">There doesnt really seem much point in going over the same ground again.. my reasons for why I gave Wolverines skeleton and the super Serum the device flaw was asked and I've explained them.. I get that you don't agree with them, I really do.. but as i've also explained multiple times I wouldn't now do them as devices knowing now what I know..  Your notion of what applies externally differ slightly <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  As far as I was concerned back then if it was constructed, and man made regardless of it being easy or not to remove (which is never actually stipulated as a condition for device btw) then it was suitable for the device flaw.  Especially when as far as the criteria for a device flaw go e.g if it is lost then associated powers are lost were backed up numerous times in the storylines of the relevant heroes.Like I say Vecna, I get that you don't agree with what I decided back then, but it has been done and I have absolutely no regrets about my reasons for the decisions to implement those things in that way back then, they made sense to me and that was good enough <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  But there is little point as I say going over it and over again and again.. as it achieves nothing.  the question as to why I applied it that way when i did those conversions..back then has been given and explained... I dont really know what else you want from me ro where else this particular line of query is going to go except back over what we've already been over <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />If you have other questions on why did others things I an explain then I'd happy to answer, or if you have some queries concerning recent conversions I've done or errors you noticed that need correcting etc... then I can totally help witht hose, but regarding why I used Device flaw before..on some of the earliest conversion..then I don't really know what else to tell you that I haven't already told you about the reasons for those decisions I made back then (which I still firmly support).  I'd probably do quite a few of the conversions a little differently if I was to do them again these days (though thier PL's wouldnt alter much), largely due to me being aware of a great deal more design related info now than I was then... but hindsight rarely serves any prupose but to frustrate <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> so I don't dwell too much on it .</blockquote>

Verification