Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Masters of the Arcane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halford" data-source="post: 4278649" data-attributes="member: 64844"><p>Hmmm, yes Contingency is not well worded. My reasoning is this.</p><p></p><p>Contingency may notbe used for area effect damage spell. I have this from both the Sage and Wizards customer service. If that's not enough, and both of these sources have been known to be wrong, I think the example spells (featherfall, levitate, fly, teleport, and so forth) make it quite clear that area effects are not included - well to me at least. Given the fact that there are many area effects in the PHB which might have beenincluded you would think at least one would be given as an example...right? The reasoning that just because it does not specifically say it does not it works is decidedly more dangerous than its counterpart. Now if you were talking about a targeted dispel magic cast upon yourself I could see it...</p><p></p><p>More than anything it comes down to a poorly worded spell which is quite easily clarified if one uses a little common sense. The difference between Rules as Written and Rules as Intended I suppose might allow for a loophole, but it is at best disingenuous.</p><p></p><p>However, even if you disagree with that the chained dispel magic still does not work. Chain spell only effects spells that effect a single target with a range greater than touch -ergo no area effects, and there's no way a targeted dispel is effecting someone other than you and effecting you personally, plus it could not effect the same target more than once.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halford, post: 4278649, member: 64844"] Hmmm, yes Contingency is not well worded. My reasoning is this. Contingency may notbe used for area effect damage spell. I have this from both the Sage and Wizards customer service. If that's not enough, and both of these sources have been known to be wrong, I think the example spells (featherfall, levitate, fly, teleport, and so forth) make it quite clear that area effects are not included - well to me at least. Given the fact that there are many area effects in the PHB which might have beenincluded you would think at least one would be given as an example...right? The reasoning that just because it does not specifically say it does not it works is decidedly more dangerous than its counterpart. Now if you were talking about a targeted dispel magic cast upon yourself I could see it... More than anything it comes down to a poorly worded spell which is quite easily clarified if one uses a little common sense. The difference between Rules as Written and Rules as Intended I suppose might allow for a loophole, but it is at best disingenuous. However, even if you disagree with that the chained dispel magic still does not work. Chain spell only effects spells that effect a single target with a range greater than touch -ergo no area effects, and there's no way a targeted dispel is effecting someone other than you and effecting you personally, plus it could not effect the same target more than once. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Masters of the Arcane
Top