Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 120552" data-attributes="member: 111">You know, I did my little comment all in fun, but now I have to step in to correct the record.&nbsp; Caliban NEVER said he was infallible, nor did I say he said that.&nbsp; I wrote:&quot;all but said you were infallible on the base rules .&quot;The distiction is rather large.Many times he has said how well he knows the rules.&nbsp; That's what I was refering to - he never made an actual claim of infallibility, nor did I say he did.&nbsp; Anything else is misrepresentation.Sorry, I couldn't let that one go becuase I was being misrepresented.By he way, I think Caliban is a great resource on the core rules.&nbsp; He does know them very, very well, which is what makes it amusing to spot an error.&nbsp; Often I look for his posts to see what the are are in a particualr case.&nbsp; He and I disagree on some of the more difficult and less clear rules, but on the clear ones he's rarely wrong.&nbsp; When one is rarely wrong and that is made obvious to others, then one risks providing amusement for others when one is wrong.&nbsp; I ought to know - it happens to me.&nbsp; But I've learned to have a sense of humor about it, and roll with the punches, as it were.Anyway - Caliban, I apologize.&nbsp; I did not mean to offend you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 120552, member: 111"] You know, I did my little comment all in fun, but now I have to step in to correct the record. Caliban NEVER said he was infallible, nor did I say he said that. I wrote: "[b][i]all but[/i][/b][i][/i] said you were infallible on the base rules ." The distiction is rather large. Many times he has said how well he knows the rules. That's what I was refering to - he never made an actual claim of infallibility, nor did I say he did. Anything else is misrepresentation. Sorry, I couldn't let that one go becuase I was being misrepresented. By he way, I think Caliban is a great resource on the core rules. He does know them very, very well, which is what makes it amusing to spot an error. Often I look for his posts to see what the are are in a particualr case. He and I disagree on some of the more difficult and less clear rules, but on the clear ones he's rarely wrong. When one is rarely wrong and that is made obvious to others, then one risks providing amusement for others when one [i]is[/i] wrong. I ought to know - it happens to me. But I've learned to have a sense of humor about it, and roll with the punches, as it were. Anyway - Caliban, I apologize. I did not mean to offend you. [/QUOTE]

Verification