Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Math glitch" -- explanation or pointer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eamon" data-source="post: 4974372" data-attributes="member: 51942"><p>Using multiple implements and/or weapons is hard to pull off and usually sub-optimal as is simply due to class features/powers, weapon focus and/or other weapon/implement specific feats, and the expense of magic implements and weapons. Expertise pushes things even further in that direction, where each character is <em>strongly</em> pushed towards specialization. This also impacts the usability of otherwise fun attacks such as the minotaur's gore and the dragonborn's breath weapon. Anything outside of the extremely narrow focus that expertise and the rest of the feats provide quickly becomes laughable sub-optimal.</p><p></p><p>It's especially frustrating to want to design an <em>interesting</em>, <em>flavorful </em>PC with feats that support that flavor, and then to discover that there are a few feats that are hugely more powerful than the norm for <em>all</em> characters. The expertise feats are overpowered at level 1, and there's just no question of taking them at high epic levels.</p><p></p><p>So, the problem isn't just that they force (boring) specialization and make things difficult for otherwise fine multi-weapon or implement builds, it's that the feats are an absolutely non-optional choice if you intend to make a character balanced with other characters that <em>do</em> take the feat. It doesn't matter what the intent was here; the result matters, and that's that it introduces a non-optional, inflexible balance fix via the feat system.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, it's just a poorly implemented math fix. I'd be absolutely thrilled if WotC were to errata these feats into non-existance and simply hand out the appropriate bonuses to everyone for all attacks and defenses in question. The "weak" NAD each character posseses is an unfortunate flaw - but I don't think that forcing each character to have a small weak spot is particularly problematic. Different characters will have different weak spots, and it's certainly not nearly as problematic as the current situation, and could indeed be remedied by a feat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eamon, post: 4974372, member: 51942"] Using multiple implements and/or weapons is hard to pull off and usually sub-optimal as is simply due to class features/powers, weapon focus and/or other weapon/implement specific feats, and the expense of magic implements and weapons. Expertise pushes things even further in that direction, where each character is [I]strongly[/I] pushed towards specialization. This also impacts the usability of otherwise fun attacks such as the minotaur's gore and the dragonborn's breath weapon. Anything outside of the extremely narrow focus that expertise and the rest of the feats provide quickly becomes laughable sub-optimal. It's especially frustrating to want to design an [I]interesting[/I], [I]flavorful [/I]PC with feats that support that flavor, and then to discover that there are a few feats that are hugely more powerful than the norm for [I]all[/I] characters. The expertise feats are overpowered at level 1, and there's just no question of taking them at high epic levels. So, the problem isn't just that they force (boring) specialization and make things difficult for otherwise fine multi-weapon or implement builds, it's that the feats are an absolutely non-optional choice if you intend to make a character balanced with other characters that [I]do[/I] take the feat. It doesn't matter what the intent was here; the result matters, and that's that it introduces a non-optional, inflexible balance fix via the feat system. So yeah, it's just a poorly implemented math fix. I'd be absolutely thrilled if WotC were to errata these feats into non-existance and simply hand out the appropriate bonuses to everyone for all attacks and defenses in question. The "weak" NAD each character posseses is an unfortunate flaw - but I don't think that forcing each character to have a small weak spot is particularly problematic. Different characters will have different weak spots, and it's certainly not nearly as problematic as the current situation, and could indeed be remedied by a feat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Math glitch" -- explanation or pointer?
Top