Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matrix Revolutions - just watched it again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 1499991" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>But Lucas was up-front from the beginning about it being a trilogy. The creators of the Matrix, from what I've read, were all about it being one movie. They didn't start talking about the continuing story until they got a big honkin' load of money. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. It's hardly a passion of mine, and this is just from a few interviews. In the pre-first-movie ones, they're talking about the story of that one movie, never even hinting of it as a possible trilogy (from what I read).</p><p></p><p>In fact, Star Wars was in my mind as a stark contrast to the Matrix -- the former was a series whose first movie did stand on its own but also clearly indicated future stories and completions of other arcs, while the latter seemed, to me at least, to be clearly self-contained, with no real need for a sequel.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do not believe this to be an accurate statement. It was certainly not clear to me. It does not seem to have been clear to others, based on popular commentary. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The most likely reason for this difference being that the Matrix was meant to be one standalone movie.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>From all relevant perspectives, that's the most important thing. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> I'm quite happily at a point now where I don't watch movies because I <strong>ought</strong> to like them, and I don't shy away from movies because I <strong>shouldn't</strong> like them. As long as you enjoy it, life is good.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, the Oracle worked fine for me in the first movie all by herself. I mean, she wasn't particularly plausible without additional information, but when you strip away the sci-fi gloss of virtual reality and actually look at the nature of the plot, it's a traditional fantasy story. And traditional fantasy stories always have mysterious old soothsayers who elliptically tell Prophecy Lad that he's destined to save the kingdom -- or, in this case, tell him that he's <strong>not</strong> destined to save the kingdom, specifically in order to psych him out so that he later feels compelled to go save the kingdom anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 1499991, member: 5171"] But Lucas was up-front from the beginning about it being a trilogy. The creators of the Matrix, from what I've read, were all about it being one movie. They didn't start talking about the continuing story until they got a big honkin' load of money. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. It's hardly a passion of mine, and this is just from a few interviews. In the pre-first-movie ones, they're talking about the story of that one movie, never even hinting of it as a possible trilogy (from what I read). In fact, Star Wars was in my mind as a stark contrast to the Matrix -- the former was a series whose first movie did stand on its own but also clearly indicated future stories and completions of other arcs, while the latter seemed, to me at least, to be clearly self-contained, with no real need for a sequel. I do not believe this to be an accurate statement. It was certainly not clear to me. It does not seem to have been clear to others, based on popular commentary. The most likely reason for this difference being that the Matrix was meant to be one standalone movie. From all relevant perspectives, that's the most important thing. :D I'm quite happily at a point now where I don't watch movies because I [b]ought[/b] to like them, and I don't shy away from movies because I [b]shouldn't[/b] like them. As long as you enjoy it, life is good. Actually, the Oracle worked fine for me in the first movie all by herself. I mean, she wasn't particularly plausible without additional information, but when you strip away the sci-fi gloss of virtual reality and actually look at the nature of the plot, it's a traditional fantasy story. And traditional fantasy stories always have mysterious old soothsayers who elliptically tell Prophecy Lad that he's destined to save the kingdom -- or, in this case, tell him that he's [b]not[/b] destined to save the kingdom, specifically in order to psych him out so that he later feels compelled to go save the kingdom anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matrix Revolutions - just watched it again
Top