Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matrix Revolutions - just watched it again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="demiurge1138" data-source="post: 1501931" data-attributes="member: 7451"><p>I enjoyed the Matrix sequels to a certain extent. Not as much as the first movie, but they were entertaining. The primary problem with them, however, is that the Brothers didn't do enough to make them two good movies- we end up with two OK movies that could have been one that was as good as the first.</p><p></p><p>My biggest problem with Matrix: Revolutions is the battle between the Sentinels and the defenders of Zion. Sure, it looks cool. But we don't really care about these characters. The only one we've seen in a human situation is the kid, and even then most of his character development is in the Animatrix. OK, there is the Link and Zee romance thing, but that's so briefly glossed over in Reloaded that we've half forgotten it by the time Revolutions came out. If we cared about Mifune, if we really got more of Link and Zee's love, and if we knew why, exactly, Niobe and Morpheus were racing the squiddies (I've only seen the movie once, so I might have missed that), the same scenes would have been more powerful.</p><p></p><p>The best parts of Revolutions are the bits taking place in the Matrix itself. Hugo Weaving is still a god among character actors, and the multi-Smith it nice and atmospheric, even if they don't use the swarm tactics from Reloaded. The Oracle's pronouncements actually have some clear meaning this time around, but overall Revolutions suffers from the same problem Reloaded did: pop philosophy.</p><p></p><p>The first Matrix brought up, in Hollywood style, the age-old questions about the nature of reality. The philosophy was fairly clear, and the exposition was necessary; after all, Neo just escaped from his pod. But now Neo's the Messiah (even though he acts more like Norton Antivirus). Why hasn't this been explained to him? Why does it need to be explained to him? Just so the Brothers can feel hip and eat up screentime with dialouge in order to compensate for expensive fight sequences.</p><p></p><p>But why not spend that screentime on character development? Harder to write. The Brother's laziness in scripting sabotages the films, making them empty excercises in pretention and wire-fu instead of truly fulfilling movies.</p><p></p><p>OK, maybe that was a little harsher than I intended. There were a lot of bits in the Matrix sequels I liked. But there were a lot of bits I didn't. And my final verdict is eh. They're OK. Nothing too special.</p><p></p><p>Demiurge out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="demiurge1138, post: 1501931, member: 7451"] I enjoyed the Matrix sequels to a certain extent. Not as much as the first movie, but they were entertaining. The primary problem with them, however, is that the Brothers didn't do enough to make them two good movies- we end up with two OK movies that could have been one that was as good as the first. My biggest problem with Matrix: Revolutions is the battle between the Sentinels and the defenders of Zion. Sure, it looks cool. But we don't really care about these characters. The only one we've seen in a human situation is the kid, and even then most of his character development is in the Animatrix. OK, there is the Link and Zee romance thing, but that's so briefly glossed over in Reloaded that we've half forgotten it by the time Revolutions came out. If we cared about Mifune, if we really got more of Link and Zee's love, and if we knew why, exactly, Niobe and Morpheus were racing the squiddies (I've only seen the movie once, so I might have missed that), the same scenes would have been more powerful. The best parts of Revolutions are the bits taking place in the Matrix itself. Hugo Weaving is still a god among character actors, and the multi-Smith it nice and atmospheric, even if they don't use the swarm tactics from Reloaded. The Oracle's pronouncements actually have some clear meaning this time around, but overall Revolutions suffers from the same problem Reloaded did: pop philosophy. The first Matrix brought up, in Hollywood style, the age-old questions about the nature of reality. The philosophy was fairly clear, and the exposition was necessary; after all, Neo just escaped from his pod. But now Neo's the Messiah (even though he acts more like Norton Antivirus). Why hasn't this been explained to him? Why does it need to be explained to him? Just so the Brothers can feel hip and eat up screentime with dialouge in order to compensate for expensive fight sequences. But why not spend that screentime on character development? Harder to write. The Brother's laziness in scripting sabotages the films, making them empty excercises in pretention and wire-fu instead of truly fulfilling movies. OK, maybe that was a little harsher than I intended. There were a lot of bits in the Matrix sequels I liked. But there were a lot of bits I didn't. And my final verdict is eh. They're OK. Nothing too special. Demiurge out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matrix Revolutions - just watched it again
Top