Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matrix Revolutions SPOILER filled discussion [and my review]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chain Lightning" data-source="post: 1217634" data-attributes="member: 6791"><p>You know, that's what I came away from the movie thinking too. That was also my interpretation of the scene. But I guess I was hasty to label the scene as unclearly told because so many others on the boards were walking away with these varying versions. One guy said Neo self destructed. I was like, "What? He did? I thought the machine leader guy pumped all the energy into him to make him explode."</p><p></p><p>So, if you and I have the same conclusion, what does that mean? Does it mean that our version is most likely the correct interpretation? Or we just so happen to be two guys that have the same incorrect interpretation? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Hopefully, no one will walk in on my post and reply, "but that's what's beautiful about the films, you are left to wonder and figure things out for yourself". Now, while I believe a film shouldn't treat their audiences like dumbies, there is a balance when it comes to storytelling. If you go to far and be abstract too much, you end up like David Lynch. Who's to say what is left up to us and what was simply poorly told? The arguement that it is neat to leave it up to the viewer is okay on certian types of story formula, but it can't be used to excuse every bit of sloppy filming. </p><p></p><p>(Sort of Off Topic: It used to be neat that the guy at McDonald's filled my cup for me, no I gotta do it.....)</p><p></p><p>Okay, we agree on the resolution of Smith. I don't what these other crackpots are thinking....but I think you and I are right. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Heh heh heh.</p><p></p><p>I still think its the weakest of the three films. There wasn't enough drama or emotion to feel like a climatic ending to a trilogy. Dialogue was still bad and the ending was still very uninteresting artistically. Odd, considering the style of the whole trilogy is the visual style. That being so, the visual style of the ending scenes were the most boring and un-artistic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chain Lightning, post: 1217634, member: 6791"] You know, that's what I came away from the movie thinking too. That was also my interpretation of the scene. But I guess I was hasty to label the scene as unclearly told because so many others on the boards were walking away with these varying versions. One guy said Neo self destructed. I was like, "What? He did? I thought the machine leader guy pumped all the energy into him to make him explode." So, if you and I have the same conclusion, what does that mean? Does it mean that our version is most likely the correct interpretation? Or we just so happen to be two guys that have the same incorrect interpretation? :) Hopefully, no one will walk in on my post and reply, "but that's what's beautiful about the films, you are left to wonder and figure things out for yourself". Now, while I believe a film shouldn't treat their audiences like dumbies, there is a balance when it comes to storytelling. If you go to far and be abstract too much, you end up like David Lynch. Who's to say what is left up to us and what was simply poorly told? The arguement that it is neat to leave it up to the viewer is okay on certian types of story formula, but it can't be used to excuse every bit of sloppy filming. (Sort of Off Topic: It used to be neat that the guy at McDonald's filled my cup for me, no I gotta do it.....) Okay, we agree on the resolution of Smith. I don't what these other crackpots are thinking....but I think you and I are right. :) Heh heh heh. I still think its the weakest of the three films. There wasn't enough drama or emotion to feel like a climatic ending to a trilogy. Dialogue was still bad and the ending was still very uninteresting artistically. Odd, considering the style of the whole trilogy is the visual style. That being so, the visual style of the ending scenes were the most boring and un-artistic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matrix Revolutions SPOILER filled discussion [and my review]
Top