Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matter/antimatter imbalenc - forked from AMA ask a physicist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="freyar" data-source="post: 6688909" data-attributes="member: 40227"><p>Yes, though right now we don't know if sterile neutrinos exist. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not FTL --- neutinos travel at light speed --- but for SETI a neutrino telescope has an advantage that one detector can see in all directions, since neutrinos pass right through the earth. Or an advanced civilization could use a neutrino beam to communicate through a nebula or something. </p><p></p><p>The real advantage of neutrino communication is that they can pass through matter, so you could for example communicate with Australia or China from the US without bouncing the signal off a satellite. I looked into it, and people seem a bit excited about the possibility for communication with submarines. It would be very low bandwidth, but submarines already have low bandwidth communications since they have to use extremely low frequency electromagnetic waves that can't be modulated quickly (radio waves can't penetrate water).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Remember that antimatter particles interact the same was as the corresponding matter particles but with opposite charge. So positrons -- anti-electrons -- interact by electromagnetism just as strongly as electrons do. Also, I might have been a bit confusing in my first post: sterile neutrinos would be some whole new type of particle, not antineutrinos (the antiparticles of neutrinos). We have lots of observations of antineutrinos. You also seem to be thinking about why sterile neutrinos don't feel the electromagnetic, strong, or weak forces. One answer is that they just don't. Of course, there are highly speculative theories that give reasons, like maybe most matter is at one place in extra dimensions and sterile neutrinos are somewhere else. It's not "quantum phase" like sometimes messes up people in Star Trek, but it is kind of out there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What Umbran said. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="freyar, post: 6688909, member: 40227"] Yes, though right now we don't know if sterile neutrinos exist. ;) Not FTL --- neutinos travel at light speed --- but for SETI a neutrino telescope has an advantage that one detector can see in all directions, since neutrinos pass right through the earth. Or an advanced civilization could use a neutrino beam to communicate through a nebula or something. The real advantage of neutrino communication is that they can pass through matter, so you could for example communicate with Australia or China from the US without bouncing the signal off a satellite. I looked into it, and people seem a bit excited about the possibility for communication with submarines. It would be very low bandwidth, but submarines already have low bandwidth communications since they have to use extremely low frequency electromagnetic waves that can't be modulated quickly (radio waves can't penetrate water). Remember that antimatter particles interact the same was as the corresponding matter particles but with opposite charge. So positrons -- anti-electrons -- interact by electromagnetism just as strongly as electrons do. Also, I might have been a bit confusing in my first post: sterile neutrinos would be some whole new type of particle, not antineutrinos (the antiparticles of neutrinos). We have lots of observations of antineutrinos. You also seem to be thinking about why sterile neutrinos don't feel the electromagnetic, strong, or weak forces. One answer is that they just don't. Of course, there are highly speculative theories that give reasons, like maybe most matter is at one place in extra dimensions and sterile neutrinos are somewhere else. It's not "quantum phase" like sometimes messes up people in Star Trek, but it is kind of out there. What Umbran said. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matter/antimatter imbalenc - forked from AMA ask a physicist
Top