Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matter/antimatter imbalenc - forked from AMA ask a physicist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="freyar" data-source="post: 6691127" data-attributes="member: 40227"><p>For quarks, up/down, charm/strange, and top/bottom are sort of like "weak force charges" for quarks (very very roughly, think of the first of the pair having one charge and the second a different charge), though it's somewhat more complicated than that. But the weak nuclear force is extremely short range and can't really reach even across a nucleus very well. To understand the binding of a nucleus, we need to talk about the strong nuclear force. </p><p></p><p>First off, protons and neutrons are made of fundamental particles called quarks. Quarks carry "strong force charge" known as <em>color</em>. There are three colors (red, green, and blue) for quarks (anti-quarks have anti-colors, which you might call cyan, magenta, and yellow or less imaginatively anti-red, etc). The strong force is actually strong enough that you can't have a colored object like a quark sitting around by itself. If you tried to pull the quarks of a proton apart (by, for example smashing the proton with something), the energy you'd need to do that would actually be sufficient to produce (lots of) quark/antiquark pairs from the vacuum, which would the assemble with the original quarks from the proton. So, in the end, every particle we see on it's own is color-neutral: you can either have a quark/antiquark bound together (so it would have a color plus the corresponding anti-color, which adds to no color) or three quarks with one red, one green, one blue so the colors add to "white." Quark/antiquark states are called <em>mesons</em> and include the pions I mentioned earlier, and the three-quark states, including protons and neutrons, are <em>baryons</em>. Together, mesons and baryons are called hadrons, as Umbran already said. <strong>Short version:</strong> the quarks in protons and neutrons are held together by the strong force, and protons and neutrons are therefore strong-force-neutral.</p><p></p><p>But even though protons and neutrons don't carry color, the strong force still holds them together. The analogy is the van der Waals force between electrically neutral atoms: if two atoms are close together, the electrons and nuclei inside can move around so there is a net attraction between the atoms. It's much much more complicated (to the point where we don't have a good way to calculate it from first principles), but protons and neutrons in a nucleus are held together by the strong force version of the van der Waals force. And, yes, that is strong enough to overcome the electromagnetic repulsion among the protons (which all have the same electric charge). </p><p></p><p>Last note: there have also recently been discoveries of 4-quark and 5-quark bound states (<em>tetraquarks</em> and <em>pentaquarks</em>) but not a lot is known about them yet. Tetraquarks have two quarks and two antiquarks; pentaquarks have 4 quarks and one antiquark. The question is whether they are one big blob of quarks or something like a meson orbiting another meson/baryon. These qre quite unstable, though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="freyar, post: 6691127, member: 40227"] For quarks, up/down, charm/strange, and top/bottom are sort of like "weak force charges" for quarks (very very roughly, think of the first of the pair having one charge and the second a different charge), though it's somewhat more complicated than that. But the weak nuclear force is extremely short range and can't really reach even across a nucleus very well. To understand the binding of a nucleus, we need to talk about the strong nuclear force. First off, protons and neutrons are made of fundamental particles called quarks. Quarks carry "strong force charge" known as [I]color[/I]. There are three colors (red, green, and blue) for quarks (anti-quarks have anti-colors, which you might call cyan, magenta, and yellow or less imaginatively anti-red, etc). The strong force is actually strong enough that you can't have a colored object like a quark sitting around by itself. If you tried to pull the quarks of a proton apart (by, for example smashing the proton with something), the energy you'd need to do that would actually be sufficient to produce (lots of) quark/antiquark pairs from the vacuum, which would the assemble with the original quarks from the proton. So, in the end, every particle we see on it's own is color-neutral: you can either have a quark/antiquark bound together (so it would have a color plus the corresponding anti-color, which adds to no color) or three quarks with one red, one green, one blue so the colors add to "white." Quark/antiquark states are called [I]mesons[/I] and include the pions I mentioned earlier, and the three-quark states, including protons and neutrons, are [I]baryons[/I]. Together, mesons and baryons are called hadrons, as Umbran already said. [B]Short version:[/B] the quarks in protons and neutrons are held together by the strong force, and protons and neutrons are therefore strong-force-neutral. But even though protons and neutrons don't carry color, the strong force still holds them together. The analogy is the van der Waals force between electrically neutral atoms: if two atoms are close together, the electrons and nuclei inside can move around so there is a net attraction between the atoms. It's much much more complicated (to the point where we don't have a good way to calculate it from first principles), but protons and neutrons in a nucleus are held together by the strong force version of the van der Waals force. And, yes, that is strong enough to overcome the electromagnetic repulsion among the protons (which all have the same electric charge). Last note: there have also recently been discoveries of 4-quark and 5-quark bound states ([I]tetraquarks[/I] and [I]pentaquarks[/I]) but not a lot is known about them yet. Tetraquarks have two quarks and two antiquarks; pentaquarks have 4 quarks and one antiquark. The question is whether they are one big blob of quarks or something like a meson orbiting another meson/baryon. These qre quite unstable, though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Matter/antimatter imbalenc - forked from AMA ask a physicist
Top