Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Yavathol" data-source="post: 6859885" data-attributes="member: 33284">I'm away from my book now, but from what I remember, you have to have a clear path to the target square when the spell is cast.&nbsp; Neither the section on targeting nor the section on duration say anything about maintaining line of sight to prevent it expiring, only about maintaining concentration, which implies to me that concentration alone is sufficient?If the caster was in range of where he was when the spell was cast, and used his Action for something else, the hand would continue to restrain a creature, since the spell doesn't explicitly say the hand lets go if not activated.&nbsp; Ditto if the caster has moved, the range doesn't matter.&nbsp; IMHO<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Yavathol, post: 6859885, member: 33284"] I'm away from my book now, but from what I remember, you have to have a clear path to the target square when the spell is cast. Neither the section on targeting nor the section on duration say anything about maintaining line of sight to prevent it expiring, only about maintaining concentration, which implies to me that concentration alone is sufficient? If the caster was in range of where he was when the spell was cast, and used his Action for something else, the hand would continue to restrain a creature, since the spell doesn't explicitly say the hand lets go if not activated. Ditto if the caster has moved, the range doesn't matter. IMHO:) [/QUOTE]

Verification