Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Maximized Dispel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James McMurray" data-source="post: 1446909" data-attributes="member: 743"><p>An ioun stone for +1 caster level would be 30,000gp. What other items are there? I could be wrong, but don't most dictionaries define "couple" as "two"? Again, more proof we're using the same words to mean different things.</p><p></p><p>The vast majority of the time, the ability to dispel anything that a remove curse can remove is not a big deal. Certainly not enough to warrant using it over maximized dispel magic. Got a problem with a curse? Memorize a Remove Curse.</p><p></p><p>You're preaching to the choir here. I already said that I house rule MDJ to make it more palatable to my group. I was just refuting your assertion that there are no risks involved in casting MDJ, something that is demonstrably not true.</p><p></p><p>Isn't that nice. You like something, so disregard others' opinions as having "no reason." Good job.</p><p></p><p>a) "There is nothing wrong with the miniatures handbook"</p><p>b) "every book will have a few problems"</p><p></p><p>thus we can deduce</p><p></p><p>c) The Miniatures Handbook is not a book.</p><p></p><p>Intriguing. Not only are we using different dictionaries and math, we're also using different ruls for what makes an argument valid and sound.</p><p></p><p>It only has one "in your opinion." But I don't have it with me so I can't point to the rest of them. And as you said in another thread "this thread isnt about that."</p><p></p><p>Targetted maximized Dispel Magic <strong>will</strong> take out all of the buffs on one person, unless that person is caster level 20. Targetted maximized Greater Dispel Magic <strong>will</strong> take out all of the buffs on one person, unless that person is caster level 29. </p><p></p><p>I think you are way overstating your case. Can you give instances where maximied dispel isn't more powerful than a non-maximized dispel? Other than "you need to remove a curse or your foe is 20th level." That is a pretty shallow case.</p><p></p><p>Looking back at my posts I fail to see where I ever said anything about there being a single foe with thousands of buufs that can't work without them. If you're trying to take out <em>any</em> spell except those that require remove curse, a maximized dispel magic is better than a greater dispel magic until you begin facing spells with a caster level of 20. In most cases the differential is quite large. </p><p> </p><p>Or its only a "couple" of levels, depending on whether we use Webster's or Scion's dictionary.</p><p>Just because you ignore things I say doesn't mean I didn't say them. How is +9 "slightly better"? For that matter, how is +6 "slightly better"? </p><p></p><p>You keep saying maximize has few uses. I disagree. I think maximize is a fine metamagic feat as written. Granted it isn't as powerful as some, but its better than others.</p><p></p><p>Its weaker if you don't mind destroying the gear you would have gotten when the foe is killed. Its weaker if you don't mind risking catching your allies in the area of effect and posible destroying their gear. In other words, its only sometimes weaker.</p><p></p><p>If your foe is 30th caster level. How often does that happen?</p><p> </p><p>Yep, dispel does nothing to destroy your gear or the loot. I would rather just debuff my foe and then reap the rewards.</p><p> </p><p>That's one for you, two for me.</p><p>Looks like we're tied at one for one. Technically though, you'll never reduce it to 0%, because no matter what you do, a 1 will always fail. An even if you do manage to keep your spellcasting abilities, what about the powerful being whose interest you just attracted. I hope it isn't someone who didn't want that artifact destroyed.</p><p></p><p>I already have. Try scrolling up. Until you can do that, my end of this conversation is over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James McMurray, post: 1446909, member: 743"] An ioun stone for +1 caster level would be 30,000gp. What other items are there? I could be wrong, but don't most dictionaries define "couple" as "two"? Again, more proof we're using the same words to mean different things. The vast majority of the time, the ability to dispel anything that a remove curse can remove is not a big deal. Certainly not enough to warrant using it over maximized dispel magic. Got a problem with a curse? Memorize a Remove Curse. You're preaching to the choir here. I already said that I house rule MDJ to make it more palatable to my group. I was just refuting your assertion that there are no risks involved in casting MDJ, something that is demonstrably not true. Isn't that nice. You like something, so disregard others' opinions as having "no reason." Good job. a) "There is nothing wrong with the miniatures handbook" b) "every book will have a few problems" thus we can deduce c) The Miniatures Handbook is not a book. Intriguing. Not only are we using different dictionaries and math, we're also using different ruls for what makes an argument valid and sound. It only has one "in your opinion." But I don't have it with me so I can't point to the rest of them. And as you said in another thread "this thread isnt about that." Targetted maximized Dispel Magic [b]will[/b] take out all of the buffs on one person, unless that person is caster level 20. Targetted maximized Greater Dispel Magic [b]will[/b] take out all of the buffs on one person, unless that person is caster level 29. I think you are way overstating your case. Can you give instances where maximied dispel isn't more powerful than a non-maximized dispel? Other than "you need to remove a curse or your foe is 20th level." That is a pretty shallow case. Looking back at my posts I fail to see where I ever said anything about there being a single foe with thousands of buufs that can't work without them. If you're trying to take out [i]any[/i] spell except those that require remove curse, a maximized dispel magic is better than a greater dispel magic until you begin facing spells with a caster level of 20. In most cases the differential is quite large. Or its only a "couple" of levels, depending on whether we use Webster's or Scion's dictionary. Just because you ignore things I say doesn't mean I didn't say them. How is +9 "slightly better"? For that matter, how is +6 "slightly better"? You keep saying maximize has few uses. I disagree. I think maximize is a fine metamagic feat as written. Granted it isn't as powerful as some, but its better than others. Its weaker if you don't mind destroying the gear you would have gotten when the foe is killed. Its weaker if you don't mind risking catching your allies in the area of effect and posible destroying their gear. In other words, its only sometimes weaker. If your foe is 30th caster level. How often does that happen? Yep, dispel does nothing to destroy your gear or the loot. I would rather just debuff my foe and then reap the rewards. That's one for you, two for me. Looks like we're tied at one for one. Technically though, you'll never reduce it to 0%, because no matter what you do, a 1 will always fail. An even if you do manage to keep your spellcasting abilities, what about the powerful being whose interest you just attracted. I hope it isn't someone who didn't want that artifact destroyed. I already have. Try scrolling up. Until you can do that, my end of this conversation is over. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Maximized Dispel?
Top