Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="scholz" data-source="post: 3385867" data-attributes="member: 10028">I am not sure what is disingenuous about my suggestion. I am all for the front line fighters having high hit points (the damage absorbing element). Sincerely, I mean it. If you want to play a Tank, someone who primarily absorbs damage on the front line, that is cool too, put those extra points in a high Con. You won't be sorry. I think, sincerely, you can still do your job and have a decent Intelligence or Charisma, or at least you should be able to. But, (a) I don't think front line meleeists are necessarily tanks, and (b) I don't think agreeing to be a front line person commits one to sacrificing all other aspects of play (or should anyway). Agreed. Although, without knowing the exact math, I wouldn't be surprised if you are better off over most combats with a higher offense than defense in terms of ending a threat quickly. eh.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="scholz, post: 3385867, member: 10028"] I am not sure what is disingenuous about my suggestion. I am all for the front line fighters having high hit points (the damage absorbing element). Sincerely, I mean it. If you want to play a Tank, someone who primarily absorbs damage on the front line, that is cool too, put those extra points in a high Con. You won't be sorry. I think, sincerely, you can still do your job and have a decent Intelligence or Charisma, or at least you should be able to. But, (a) I don't think front line meleeists are necessarily tanks, and (b) I don't think agreeing to be a front line person commits one to sacrificing all other aspects of play (or should anyway). Agreed. Although, without knowing the exact math, I wouldn't be surprised if you are better off over most combats with a higher offense than defense in terms of ending a threat quickly. eh. [/QUOTE]

Verification