Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Maya, Aztec, Toltec, Inca
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 1085859" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>Actually, at least in our current culture, the sacrifice or murder--even of willing individuals--<em>is</em> generally viewed as evil. When people remember Jonestown, it's generally with horror that all of Jim Jones's followers were convinced to poison themselves. Similarly, the Heaven's Gate incident is remembered for the horror of the mass-suicide. While there are significant portions of the public willing to endorse assisted suicide, most want very strict controls on it--to limit it to incurably ill individuals or those who are in horrific, irremediable pain. To assist an individual who is merely depressed in committing suicide is generally seen as evil/wrong.</p><p></p><p>From most religious points of view, human sacrifice--willing or not--would be wrong as well. Especially from points of view that take the claim of the sacrificial ritual to impart spiritual power seriously but dispute the source of the power.</p><p></p><p>The rest of the discussion of relativistic "morality" (a different notion from cultural relativism--just because people disagree on a question doesn't mean that they're all wrong; it certainly doesn't mean that they're all correct. Either of those positions requires a whole lot more philosophical justification than simply "people have disagreed on this"), it's one of the things that doesn't really matter for this discussion. The original poster and his players are not people from three centuries in the future or from five centuries in the past and they will judge things by their standards or they won't judge things at all--however the latter isn't really an option since one has to act and action implies a better/worse judgement. (And, for all we know, the people of the future could decide that murder is OK as long as you kill Jews, slavery is OK as long as the slaves are from a particular racial group, that denying that Mohammed is God's prophet is a crime worthy of death, and/or that rape isn't a serious crime--it's folly to think that the future will be morally or physically better just because it hasn't happened yet. In 1921, German Jews or Russian Kulaks might have thought so but they would have been wrong (at least in the short term)).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 1085859, member: 3146"] Actually, at least in our current culture, the sacrifice or murder--even of willing individuals--[i]is[/i] generally viewed as evil. When people remember Jonestown, it's generally with horror that all of Jim Jones's followers were convinced to poison themselves. Similarly, the Heaven's Gate incident is remembered for the horror of the mass-suicide. While there are significant portions of the public willing to endorse assisted suicide, most want very strict controls on it--to limit it to incurably ill individuals or those who are in horrific, irremediable pain. To assist an individual who is merely depressed in committing suicide is generally seen as evil/wrong. From most religious points of view, human sacrifice--willing or not--would be wrong as well. Especially from points of view that take the claim of the sacrificial ritual to impart spiritual power seriously but dispute the source of the power. The rest of the discussion of relativistic "morality" (a different notion from cultural relativism--just because people disagree on a question doesn't mean that they're all wrong; it certainly doesn't mean that they're all correct. Either of those positions requires a whole lot more philosophical justification than simply "people have disagreed on this"), it's one of the things that doesn't really matter for this discussion. The original poster and his players are not people from three centuries in the future or from five centuries in the past and they will judge things by their standards or they won't judge things at all--however the latter isn't really an option since one has to act and action implies a better/worse judgement. (And, for all we know, the people of the future could decide that murder is OK as long as you kill Jews, slavery is OK as long as the slaves are from a particular racial group, that denying that Mohammed is God's prophet is a crime worthy of death, and/or that rape isn't a serious crime--it's folly to think that the future will be morally or physically better just because it hasn't happened yet. In 1921, German Jews or Russian Kulaks might have thought so but they would have been wrong (at least in the short term)). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Maya, Aztec, Toltec, Inca
Top