Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 6020054" data-attributes="member: 10479"><p>Have you checked your PF products?&nbsp; This might be more problematic than you think but not for the PF SRD website.&nbsp; That website is bound to reproduce the section 15 of the products whence they gathered their OGC, so as long as they have done that they aren't themselves in error.&nbsp; As discussed above, Section 9 allows you to use a later version of the license to include OGC released under earlier versions but not the other way around.&nbsp; So it might be that any product getting their OGC directly from the SRDs is where the problem lies and that the website, getting their OGC from those products is merely reproducing the Section 15 of those products and likely covered even if in error.&nbsp; Should this become and actual issue, whoever is in actual error has Section 13's 30 day cure period to handle their error but, those in error further down the line are in the clear due to the last part of Section 13 which doesn't hold sub-licensees responsible for the errors proliferated higher up the chain.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Mark CMG, post: 6020054, member: 10479"] Have you checked your PF products? This might be more problematic than you think but not for the PF SRD website. That website is bound to reproduce the section 15 of the products whence they gathered their OGC, so as long as they have done that they aren't themselves in error. As discussed above, Section 9 allows you to use a later version of the license to include OGC released under earlier versions but not the other way around. So it might be that any product getting their OGC directly from the SRDs is where the problem lies and that the website, getting their OGC from those products is merely reproducing the Section 15 of those products and likely covered even if in error. Should this become and actual issue, whoever is in actual error has Section 13's 30 day cure period to handle their error but, those in error further down the line are in the clear due to the last part of Section 13 which doesn't hold sub-licensees responsible for the errors proliferated higher up the chain. [/QUOTE]

Verification