Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 4433743" data-attributes="member: 22779">RC, I'm not going to get into this pedantic pissing contest with you yet again.  While I realize you strongly believe that every word out there is equally valuable as a descriptor, I do not.  I could not care less if what you find fun is what I find fun.  I'M NOT THE ONE CLAIMING IT.The claim by Renard is that somehow 4e no longer has heart or soul.  Whatever the hell that means.  You can keep trying to turn this into mindless semantics all you like and that's fine.  But, leave me out of it please.  I find claims about heart and soul to be pretty much the same as saying, "I don't like this, therefore it's bad".  Why people cannot simply say, "I don't like this.  It is not to my taste" and leave it at that is far and beyond my comprehension.  You don't have to justify your tastes.  You really, really don't.  Not liking something is your fundamental right.  Doesn't matter why.  You can dislike whatever you wish to whatever degree you wish.But, when you start with these airy fairy claims of "heart and soul" I'm going to tune you out.  Yes, you don't like it.  I understand that.  Why is there this compelling need to go beyond?</blockquote>