Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Maybe I was ALWAYs playing 4e... even in 2e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8621913" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>No, on this I 100% agree with you. I would even add that 3e was WAY WORSE then 4e at high level, because every little circumstance chance caused a recomputation of bonuses, and you kept forgetting about some of them, which then caused backtracks, etc. It was bloody awful, first with 3e, then with Pathfinder when it became as bloated. For me, it also comes from the fact that 4e was designed as very linear in particular because although you gained a few powers, you mostly replaced them, which led to much less inflation of complexity than with 3e where everything was additive and became geometrically more complex because of combinations.</p><p></p><p>And therefore, the frustration with 3e was that it was almost impossible to run high level games, but the frustration with 4e became that high level games did not feel that much different from low level ones. Yes, you did more damage to wider areas, but your fights were still constrained on an earth-bound grid, because 3D was challenging to resolve and took a bloody long time, and it was discouraging (and physically impossible) to shift battle maps.</p><p></p><p>It was not until 5e that we recaptured the feeling of AD&D, with almost total freedom in particular using TotM. It's better than AD&D because the rules, although fuzzy, are still tighter and not relying on tons of house rules. And compared to 3e, there is still an increase of combinations but the use of Adv/Dis cuts through the bloody modifiers recomputations and the simplification of foes makes the DM's job doable. Also, concentration / attunement makes the game not so dependent on buffs and permanent items. In the end, it makes the game not so absolutely epic as AD&D and 3e, but it's really manageable and it feels cool.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you are looking for tactical fights, all games benefit from a VTT. But on the other hand, especially now that the pandemic has gone, face-to-face gaming is way better than remote, and if you want to go fully epic, at least for us, TotM is the only real option, with possibly some scribbling to vaguely keep track of who is where, and it's hard to do with a VTT/</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This off-turn (almost complete) suppression is indeed one of the great advances of 5e, it means that we can go around the table in a flash without all the backtracking and the lengthy discussions, and it really allows us to run quick exciting fights at all levels without spending the whole evening on one. Yes, it's less tactical than 4e, but it's not what we are looking for anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8621913, member: 7032025"] No, on this I 100% agree with you. I would even add that 3e was WAY WORSE then 4e at high level, because every little circumstance chance caused a recomputation of bonuses, and you kept forgetting about some of them, which then caused backtracks, etc. It was bloody awful, first with 3e, then with Pathfinder when it became as bloated. For me, it also comes from the fact that 4e was designed as very linear in particular because although you gained a few powers, you mostly replaced them, which led to much less inflation of complexity than with 3e where everything was additive and became geometrically more complex because of combinations. And therefore, the frustration with 3e was that it was almost impossible to run high level games, but the frustration with 4e became that high level games did not feel that much different from low level ones. Yes, you did more damage to wider areas, but your fights were still constrained on an earth-bound grid, because 3D was challenging to resolve and took a bloody long time, and it was discouraging (and physically impossible) to shift battle maps. It was not until 5e that we recaptured the feeling of AD&D, with almost total freedom in particular using TotM. It's better than AD&D because the rules, although fuzzy, are still tighter and not relying on tons of house rules. And compared to 3e, there is still an increase of combinations but the use of Adv/Dis cuts through the bloody modifiers recomputations and the simplification of foes makes the DM's job doable. Also, concentration / attunement makes the game not so dependent on buffs and permanent items. In the end, it makes the game not so absolutely epic as AD&D and 3e, but it's really manageable and it feels cool. If you are looking for tactical fights, all games benefit from a VTT. But on the other hand, especially now that the pandemic has gone, face-to-face gaming is way better than remote, and if you want to go fully epic, at least for us, TotM is the only real option, with possibly some scribbling to vaguely keep track of who is where, and it's hard to do with a VTT/ This off-turn (almost complete) suppression is indeed one of the great advances of 5e, it means that we can go around the table in a flash without all the backtracking and the lengthy discussions, and it really allows us to run quick exciting fights at all levels without spending the whole evening on one. Yes, it's less tactical than 4e, but it's not what we are looking for anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Maybe I was ALWAYs playing 4e... even in 2e
Top