Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls: Abilities as the core?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5619276" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>I am not saying anyone is WRONG. But look at what you've said, "pretty shoddy" ain't exactly either accurate in my opinion nor is it constructive. Actually I think the way these things were designed in 4e was a very conscious calculated game design decision, elegant, and effective. I don't demand that everyone like it, but really at least people can try to understand the underlying game design issues which were being addressed. Maybe not everyone is going to get it, but no that kind of thing isn't 'reasonable'. I'm perfectly happy to discuss what I see as the theory behind the design, but there's no answering "it's just crap!" It says nothing profound. It may express one person's feelings on the particular subject but what is the point of posting those kinds of statements? Does it win someone some kind of points? lol. Yes, I get it, there are always some in every batch... Again, it is perfectly fine to discuss it, but can we establish a few conversational skills? Can this be educational. Perhaps someone will at least gain some understanding of the why's and wherefores. I don't expect a whole lot of changing of people's taste in games, but at least understand what you're criticizing. It can only bring greater insight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5619276, member: 82106"] I am not saying anyone is WRONG. But look at what you've said, "pretty shoddy" ain't exactly either accurate in my opinion nor is it constructive. Actually I think the way these things were designed in 4e was a very conscious calculated game design decision, elegant, and effective. I don't demand that everyone like it, but really at least people can try to understand the underlying game design issues which were being addressed. Maybe not everyone is going to get it, but no that kind of thing isn't 'reasonable'. I'm perfectly happy to discuss what I see as the theory behind the design, but there's no answering "it's just crap!" It says nothing profound. It may express one person's feelings on the particular subject but what is the point of posting those kinds of statements? Does it win someone some kind of points? lol. Yes, I get it, there are always some in every batch... Again, it is perfectly fine to discuss it, but can we establish a few conversational skills? Can this be educational. Perhaps someone will at least gain some understanding of the why's and wherefores. I don't expect a whole lot of changing of people's taste in games, but at least understand what you're criticizing. It can only bring greater insight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls: Abilities as the core?
Top