Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mearls has some Interesting Ideals about how to fix high level wizards.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tigris" data-source="post: 9840005" data-attributes="member: 7043270"><p>That is one of my points. Its really easy to "fix" one problem, by introducing other ones. Thats why I prefer people to fix problems which did not create them in the first place because in gamedesign you see sooo often this "I can fix this problem (lets ignore others)" mentality. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Especially when people try to do something similar to 4e but not completly, and by not understanding 4es gamedesign introduce new problems.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Like people using ressource points instead of encounter problems which lead too just spamming the same ability all day. (Psionics in 4e already had this problem). </p><p></p><p></p><p>Or trying to solve the "alphastrike problem" by just only allowing people to use their "dailies" aftet you gained X ressources. Which makes people just use it now again as soon as they can its jusz they only can use it later. (So the "no choice" problem which is the actual one, not that the burst is in turn 1 stays the same). Only that you now dont have the nice added effect of encounter long unique effects most dailies had (which helps to make different combats feel different). </p><p></p><p></p><p>When you try to make a wizard after level 11 into a better warlock, then maybe the wizard has no problem anymore, but now the warlock does because he is now just a worse wizard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tigris, post: 9840005, member: 7043270"] That is one of my points. Its really easy to "fix" one problem, by introducing other ones. Thats why I prefer people to fix problems which did not create them in the first place because in gamedesign you see sooo often this "I can fix this problem (lets ignore others)" mentality. Especially when people try to do something similar to 4e but not completly, and by not understanding 4es gamedesign introduce new problems. Like people using ressource points instead of encounter problems which lead too just spamming the same ability all day. (Psionics in 4e already had this problem). Or trying to solve the "alphastrike problem" by just only allowing people to use their "dailies" aftet you gained X ressources. Which makes people just use it now again as soon as they can its jusz they only can use it later. (So the "no choice" problem which is the actual one, not that the burst is in turn 1 stays the same). Only that you now dont have the nice added effect of encounter long unique effects most dailies had (which helps to make different combats feel different). When you try to make a wizard after level 11 into a better warlock, then maybe the wizard has no problem anymore, but now the warlock does because he is now just a worse wizard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mearls has some Interesting Ideals about how to fix high level wizards.
Top