Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="porpentine" data-source="post: 5185778" data-attributes="member: 85339">Thought about starting another thread, but since the title of this one isn't 'Congrats Mr Mearls!' I figure comment on the appointment is legit.Then you probably missed the bit up-thread where we asked people not to turn this thread into an edition debate. While I understand the sentiment, this isn't the place for it. Don't follow up on this please, everyone. ~ PCatAs a longtime player who gave 4E many throws of the dice and moved away, this is not an appointment that fills me with expectation of a return. If WotC had an interest in healing the rift in the game - in luring back the exodus - they would not have promoted Mearls, whose design philosophy is well-expressed by that edition.To me (for me), that's a shame. I believe the great game would be better served were the rifts healed, and this appointment suggests to me that WotC are resigned to the game's division.Hope I'm wrong,The Porp.</blockquote>