Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mearls' L&L on non-combat pillars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 5976737" data-attributes="member: 6668292"><p>Yeah, this is my experience. Take the GitP <a href="http://www.giantitp.com/articles/jFppYwv7OUkegKhONNF.html" target="_blank">Diplomacy skill revision</a>. What you say clearly matters: you offer a deal, and what you offer (as determined by player input, not PC input) sets the DC. Then, you roll to see if you're successful (the better the deal or the more they like you, the easier it is), or if you fail (the worse the deal or the more they dislike you, the harder it is), and if so, to what degree you failed (failure by 1-5 means they may counteroffer; failure by 10 or more means the negotiation is over, and they're done considering what you're offering).</p><p></p><p>I use a heavily modified version of this revision for my Negotiation skill, and it <em>requires</em> player input to be used. You can't make the check without a deal. You can't say "I want this guy to be my friend" and then make a check. You can throw out a terrible deal "you should give me that sword at a discount, because I'm just awesome", but it probably won't work on most people (maybe your really good friends).</p><p></p><p>This required player input can extend to <em>every</em> social skill. So you want to roll a Bluff check... what's the lie? What modifier does that give to the roll? If you fail, does he see through the Bluff for what it is, or just think you're holding something back? If you want to ingratiate yourself to someone over a matter of weeks, what do you do to make yourself more liked? What modifier does that give?</p><p></p><p>While ExploderWizard may not like the above methods, it certainly calls for player engagement (rather than "just a die roll") by forcing players to describe what they're saying or doing to even attempt to do it; it also advances the narrative or fiction (that's the in-game events, to ExploderWizard) in the same way that talking it out with no rules would (though not necessarily with the same results, since it gives mechanical weight to PC ability).</p><p></p><p>It may bore ExploderWizard or B.T., but it's certainly more interesting to me as GM than talking everything out, because I get to see the narrative/fiction (in-game events) go places I didn't necessarily think they would, and this makes for an enjoyable experience. Of course it's preference, but the mechanics certainly don't have to be boring, and this goes double for the results. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 5976737, member: 6668292"] Yeah, this is my experience. Take the GitP [url=http://www.giantitp.com/articles/jFppYwv7OUkegKhONNF.html]Diplomacy skill revision[/url]. What you say clearly matters: you offer a deal, and what you offer (as determined by player input, not PC input) sets the DC. Then, you roll to see if you're successful (the better the deal or the more they like you, the easier it is), or if you fail (the worse the deal or the more they dislike you, the harder it is), and if so, to what degree you failed (failure by 1-5 means they may counteroffer; failure by 10 or more means the negotiation is over, and they're done considering what you're offering). I use a heavily modified version of this revision for my Negotiation skill, and it [I]requires[/I] player input to be used. You can't make the check without a deal. You can't say "I want this guy to be my friend" and then make a check. You can throw out a terrible deal "you should give me that sword at a discount, because I'm just awesome", but it probably won't work on most people (maybe your really good friends). This required player input can extend to [I]every[/I] social skill. So you want to roll a Bluff check... what's the lie? What modifier does that give to the roll? If you fail, does he see through the Bluff for what it is, or just think you're holding something back? If you want to ingratiate yourself to someone over a matter of weeks, what do you do to make yourself more liked? What modifier does that give? While ExploderWizard may not like the above methods, it certainly calls for player engagement (rather than "just a die roll") by forcing players to describe what they're saying or doing to even attempt to do it; it also advances the narrative or fiction (that's the in-game events, to ExploderWizard) in the same way that talking it out with no rules would (though not necessarily with the same results, since it gives mechanical weight to PC ability). It may bore ExploderWizard or B.T., but it's certainly more interesting to me as GM than talking everything out, because I get to see the narrative/fiction (in-game events) go places I didn't necessarily think they would, and this makes for an enjoyable experience. Of course it's preference, but the mechanics certainly don't have to be boring, and this goes double for the results. As always, play what you like :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mearls' L&L on non-combat pillars
Top