Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mearls' Legends and Lore: Miniatures Madness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LostSoul" data-source="post: 5477312" data-attributes="member: 386"><p>I think you've got the gist of the rules. I think that I <em>want</em> that rule to be disagreed upon by two reasonable players. </p><p></p><p>I think what's important are the roles and authority of different players within the game. I spend a lot of text explaining how the DM's job is different from the player's job. Keeping on focus of social dynamics, I think that, in my hack, if you constantly disagree with the DM's rulings, you should find another DM. The vagueness of that rule - that it could reasonably apply (or not) in a lot of different situations - means that each DM has great freedom and responsibility to present a consistent game world. The text of my hack, explicity and over and over again, says that the DM should base his decisions on maintaining the consistency of the game world; I think that's what makes the rule clear instead of vague.</p><p></p><p>I tend to think of "reasonable" actions like the TV show Spartacus; other DMs might disagree and go with something much more realistic/gritty, and others might want more of a high-fantasy vibe. Since one of the DM's important (and explicit) jobs in my hack is to present a consistent world, I give the DM the freedom to do that. I think that's where the personal creativity - hmm, instead of creativity let's say <em>personal spin on the setting</em> - comes in.</p><p></p><p>(Eero does a good job of explaining why I put that responsibility on the shoulders of the DM alone; in my hack, I want to challenge the <em>players,</em> and I expect them to try and push the boundaries - but they must respect the DM's rulings, or else they are "cheating"/guilty of "misconduct"/showing poor sportsmanship. One of the player's jobs is to respect the DM's rulings.)</p><p></p><p>That's one side of things. The other side is that the vagueness of the rule allows the fiction to have an impact in resolution. I think that's important as well.</p><p></p><p>But! I'm not trying to say that this is the one true way. I wrote my hack to deliver a specific game experience, so I went with these kinds of rules. I can easily see how they would <em>not</em> work given other goals.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LostSoul, post: 5477312, member: 386"] I think you've got the gist of the rules. I think that I [i]want[/i] that rule to be disagreed upon by two reasonable players. I think what's important are the roles and authority of different players within the game. I spend a lot of text explaining how the DM's job is different from the player's job. Keeping on focus of social dynamics, I think that, in my hack, if you constantly disagree with the DM's rulings, you should find another DM. The vagueness of that rule - that it could reasonably apply (or not) in a lot of different situations - means that each DM has great freedom and responsibility to present a consistent game world. The text of my hack, explicity and over and over again, says that the DM should base his decisions on maintaining the consistency of the game world; I think that's what makes the rule clear instead of vague. I tend to think of "reasonable" actions like the TV show Spartacus; other DMs might disagree and go with something much more realistic/gritty, and others might want more of a high-fantasy vibe. Since one of the DM's important (and explicit) jobs in my hack is to present a consistent world, I give the DM the freedom to do that. I think that's where the personal creativity - hmm, instead of creativity let's say [i]personal spin on the setting[/i] - comes in. (Eero does a good job of explaining why I put that responsibility on the shoulders of the DM alone; in my hack, I want to challenge the [i]players,[/i] and I expect them to try and push the boundaries - but they must respect the DM's rulings, or else they are "cheating"/guilty of "misconduct"/showing poor sportsmanship. One of the player's jobs is to respect the DM's rulings.) That's one side of things. The other side is that the vagueness of the rule allows the fiction to have an impact in resolution. I think that's important as well. But! I'm not trying to say that this is the one true way. I wrote my hack to deliver a specific game experience, so I went with these kinds of rules. I can easily see how they would [i]not[/i] work given other goals. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mearls' Legends and Lore: Miniatures Madness
Top