Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls' Legends and Lore (or, "All Roads Lead to Rome, Redux")
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannager" data-source="post: 5469844" data-attributes="member: 73683"><p>Absolutely.</p><p></p><p>I do not have the mountain-like patience of those managing the D&D brand. Were I in their position, I would focus my efforts wholly on trying to bolster the brand loyalty of those who are cool with the direction I'm heading in, while also attempting to court new blood that has a similar appreciation. I would not waste time trying to mend imagined bridges with fans who are (in my opinion) not really great fans to have in the first place. A fan who throws up his arms in frustration when you try to do something new and slightly innovative, especially in an extremely optional way (see: Fortune Cards) is not a great fan to have. You want fans who are passionate but tolerant of change, who are accepting of the basic principle that things will not always work out exactly how they want to, and who will not spend years deriding you online after they've basically rage-quit your brand.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that WotC hasn't made mistakes. They have. They know it. You know it. I know it. It happens. And when it does, they are often sheepish in their apologies over it. But when it does, there are some fans who say "<em>Whatever,</em>" and go on living their lives and enjoying the game, conscious of the fact that, frankly, whatever PR blunder WotC made this time is tiny potatoes, and is, at most, an inconvenience that might force them to make minor changes to how they enjoy a small portion of their leisure time. And there are other fans who do <em>not</em> say "<em>Whatever,</em>" but instead decide that these changes are, in fact, worth being upset over. Now, whether or not they are worth being upset over is subjective and really depends on how critical you see the stability of your hobby to the continued proper functioning of the universe. But the fact remains that while I and Mearls seem to agree on a number of things, he feels that it's worth making an effort to at least offer an olive branch to the latter group of fans. I'm not so sure that I do.</p><p></p><p>I hope that made things clearer. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannager, post: 5469844, member: 73683"] Absolutely. I do not have the mountain-like patience of those managing the D&D brand. Were I in their position, I would focus my efforts wholly on trying to bolster the brand loyalty of those who are cool with the direction I'm heading in, while also attempting to court new blood that has a similar appreciation. I would not waste time trying to mend imagined bridges with fans who are (in my opinion) not really great fans to have in the first place. A fan who throws up his arms in frustration when you try to do something new and slightly innovative, especially in an extremely optional way (see: Fortune Cards) is not a great fan to have. You want fans who are passionate but tolerant of change, who are accepting of the basic principle that things will not always work out exactly how they want to, and who will not spend years deriding you online after they've basically rage-quit your brand. I'm not saying that WotC hasn't made mistakes. They have. They know it. You know it. I know it. It happens. And when it does, they are often sheepish in their apologies over it. But when it does, there are some fans who say "[I]Whatever,[/I]" and go on living their lives and enjoying the game, conscious of the fact that, frankly, whatever PR blunder WotC made this time is tiny potatoes, and is, at most, an inconvenience that might force them to make minor changes to how they enjoy a small portion of their leisure time. And there are other fans who do [I]not[/I] say "[I]Whatever,[/I]" but instead decide that these changes are, in fact, worth being upset over. Now, whether or not they are worth being upset over is subjective and really depends on how critical you see the stability of your hobby to the continued proper functioning of the universe. But the fact remains that while I and Mearls seem to agree on a number of things, he feels that it's worth making an effort to at least offer an olive branch to the latter group of fans. I'm not so sure that I do. I hope that made things clearer. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls' Legends and Lore (or, "All Roads Lead to Rome, Redux")
Top